Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Drug Charges
Reload this Page NCIC background checks for pharmD

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Closed Thread
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:10 AM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
when I scrolled through the posts the last post dates on these were like april of this year -- after reading some mis information in it -- I was just trying to help --
  #17  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:15 AM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by BelizeBreeze
THat's nothing. We had one earlier today that was 4 YEARS old.
And I bow in front of you both, as my Tin Foil hat caught it as I logged on earlier.
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #18  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:24 AM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedemptionMan
when I scrolled through the posts the last post dates on these were like april of this year -- after reading some mis information in it -- I was just trying to help --
But your advice is far from accurate. As with this,************** #9 Yesterday, 11:43 PM
RedemptionMan
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by --PARIDISE--
What would a union do about two failed drug tests? If this idiot failed two tests for pot, he FAILED two tests for pot.

Unless of course you are going to entertain us, how he failed with second hand pot.

What a idiotic post this was to begin with.


I live in a right to work state -- We all do, what is your point?


most states above the mason dixon line are union states and workers have more rights. Hello! Knock Knock , My husband belongs to a union in the far away state of California. Don't pull that crap. A employee using and failing drug tests are not going to be protected by the union.

I said that it would not help any but he could maybe get them to request a hearing and see. You do not know any outcome until it goes down I know that for a FACT. It is very apparent you have had issues, but you need to stop spouting off your mouth on this forum.
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #19  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:36 AM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by --PARIDISE--
But your advice is far from accurate. As with this,************** #9 Yesterday, 11:43 PM
RedemptionMan
Junior Member Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 15

Quote:
Originally Posted by --PARIDISE--
What would a union do about two failed drug tests? If this idiot failed two tests for pot, he FAILED two tests for pot.

Unless of course you are going to entertain us, how he failed with second hand pot.

What a idiotic post this was to begin with.


I live in a right to work state -- We all do, what is your point?


most states above the mason dixon line are union states and workers have more rights. Hello! Knock Knock , My husband belongs to a union in the far away state of California. Don't pull that crap. A employee using and failing drug tests are not going to be protected by the union.

I said that it would not help any but he could maybe get them to request a hearing and see. You do not know any outcome until it goes down I know that for a FACT. It is very apparent you have had issues, but you need to stop spouting off your mouth on this forum.

Nobody is spouting off-- after reading posts such as this and finding that there is a lot of misinformation contained in it. as issues that you point out then I am sure that you and most people here have had issues of some point or else they would not be here. I am not questioning you or your background so do not call into question mine for I am sure that I have more knowledge of labor management law then you do. Some states provide you due process of law and I do not care if he killed somebody on the job -- as a unionized employee you have rights to hearings and due process. What effect it has depends on the outcome. I said it would probably not matter much but please research before you open your mouth and insert your foot....
  #20  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:45 AM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedemptionMan
Nobody is spouting off-- after reading posts such as this and finding that there is a lot of misinformation contained in it. as issues that you point out then I am sure that you and most people here have had issues of some point or else they would not be here. I am not questioning you or your background so do not call into question mine for I am sure that I have more knowledge of labor management law then you do. Some states provide you due process of law and I do not care if he killed somebody on the job -- as a unionized employee you have rights to hearings and due process. What effect it has depends on the outcome. I said it would probably not matter much but please research before you open your mouth and insert your foot....
I am certainly questioning your advice on this forum.
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #21  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:49 AM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
You are a senior member and I am questioning yours.. I have read your comments and maybe you should try and give advice instead of posting ignorant things like you broke the law and your a dumbass.. I think people that post threads here want advice not to be treated like that of course I do realize where you are from....LOL
  #22  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:56 AM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedemptionMan
You are a senior member and I am questioning yours.. I have read your comments and maybe you should try and give advice instead of posting ignorant things like you broke the law and your a dumbass.. I think people that post threads here want advice not to be treated like that of course I do realize where you are from....LOL
Criminals don't usually get help here. Your statement about where I am from? That is laughable, and you may want to work on your routine. You certainly could not afford my life.
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #23  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:59 AM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
I would not want to afford your life-- so I hope you have a good one....
but I am not getting into a internet pissing contest with you so I hope you sure do have a good one my friend**************
  #24  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:07 PM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
[quote=RedemptionMan]I would not want to afford your life-- so I hope you have a good one....
but I am not getting into a internet pissing contest with you so I hope you sure do have a good one my friend************** I do, thanks for caring.


You seem to be getting into pissing contests with everyone on this site.
__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #25  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:17 PM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 10,190
(QUOTE)in my state (i am wanting to be a pharmacist)(QUOTE)

And then in another post,**************.

(QUOTE)I am sure that I have more knowledge of labor management law then you do.(QUOTE)

__________________
It is our unanimous opinion that you are damn right and it should be obvious to any moron that your (ex) (SO’s ex) (boss) (landlord) (local police) should be immediately (jailed) (fired) (reprimanded) (arrested) (demoted) (shot) (evicted).
In fact, you are so astonishingly correct in this matter, it will not surprise us one bit if you are offered a generous settlement, because, by golly, that’s just how it should be.

You Rock,
Love,
Us
  #26  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:10 PM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedemptionMan
I would not want to afford your life-- so I hope you have a good one....
but I am not getting into a internet pissing contest with you so I hope you sure do have a good one my friend**************
Rainman... you are an idiot!!
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #27  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:28 PM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
either learn or leave right

this is what I said -- prove what is wrong

this thread is about pharmaD background checks and they will not go through a company anyway ...
the school could but the state boards will not they will take fingerprints and send them to the state and FBI which will report all on record convictions on you.. in my state misdomeaner convictions such as drugs and violence is grounds for dismissal of application
_____________ this is what the state board of pharmacy does and they do the same in Alabama...

.. drug charges requires DEA waviers in order to practice.
___________ this is correct as well -- a pharmacist may gain a temporary order which will need a wavier from the DEA for the drug charges in order to get a consent order and practice....

It is also important to note that as long as all your requirements of the court has been satisfied then you can apply for expungement and they should not be able to use midomeaner expungments against you
-------arkansas state law has a offender rehabilitation act which gives people convicted of msidomeaners (not violent or sex crimes) to not have them used against them in applying for a state liscense. I assume other states have similar statutes**************

However, in my state the state background check reports expungments for cetain crimes that are grounds for denial in the application process,
They get a genertic report that states "disqualifing record found" or "no disqualifing record exists for this person" so be truthful cause they can and do issue waviers
This is correct as well the law states that if you are convicted of a felony and have that expundged then that does not restore rights -- the person still has a felony conviction and it can be used against that person for professional boards ---
  #28  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:46 PM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
Bump to Jetxnae---- It seems you know a lot about interstate restraining orders --- your off cuff comments and statements bore me**************
  #29  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:47 PM
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: "Harvey and Me"
Posts: 25,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedemptionMan
Bump to Jetxnae---- It seems you know a lot about interstate restraining orders --- your off cuff comments and statements bore me**************
And stupidity bores us.
__________________
Just because I'm a miserable human being doesn't mean I'm not right...
  #30  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:52 PM
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by BelizeBreeze
And stupidity bores us.
and who the hell are you JET morons spokes person.....
Closed Thread
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.
FreeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.