Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Drug Charges

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2009, 09:23 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2

Simple Poss charge but they want my money??


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? south carolina

Hi guys need some advice i was charged with Poss of Ctrl Subs and when i was arrested i have a little over 2300$ on me and im being told that they are going to keep it. Can they really do this and do i have a right to get that back? I was told they cant do that which brings me here. Dor. Co. police are try to railroad me im thinking. Any advice greatly help. Thanks
  #2  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Vertiform City
Posts: 5,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by PossCtrlSubIV View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? south carolina

Hi guys need some advice i was charged with Poss of Ctrl Subs and when i was arrested i have a little over 2300$ on me and im being told that they are going to keep it. Can they really do this and do i have a right to get that back? I was told they cant do that which brings me here. Dor. Co. police are try to railroad me im thinking. Any advice greatly help. Thanks
You are facing a serious criminal charge.

You need a lawyer.

You CAN contest a forfeiture (the taking the money and saying you will never get it back...)

You need to act quickly.
__________________
I've often thought of becoming a golf club.
  #3  
Old 09-23-2009, 11:02 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2
I got in touch with the det. in my case and he offered me 550$ dollars back a take it or leave it speech. He's being a jerk to me cause i would not go and set up other people and get them busted. Had i actually done that i would have gotten all my money back which he stated to me the night of my arrest.
  #4  
Old 09-23-2009, 01:22 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by PossCtrlSubIV View Post
I got in touch with the det. in my case and he offered me 550$ dollars back a take it or leave it speech. He's being a jerk to me cause i would not go and set up other people and get them busted. Had i actually done that i would have gotten all my money back which he stated to me the night of my arrest.
None of this can be proven either. It is not normal for someone, especially a drug addict, to carry around such a large amount of cash. Why were in in possession of so much money? What denominations were in your possession? How did you come into possession of such a large amount of currency? If the currency was tested would it show traces of illegal narcotics?
  #5  
Old 09-23-2009, 06:32 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERAUPIKE View Post
None of this can be proven either. It is not normal for someone, especially a drug addict, to carry around such a large amount of cash. Why were in in possession of so much money? What denominations were in your possession? How did you come into possession of such a large amount of currency? If the currency was tested would it show traces of illegal narcotics?
"Drug addict"..haha way to label the guy, how much on a bet it was cannabis?

Get a lawyer regardless..make the justice system work to keep your money.

Last edited by CypressRyan; 09-23-2009 at 06:34 PM.
  #6  
Old 09-23-2009, 07:00 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 415
Not sure about s.c. Pretty sure you have the right to show up at a hearing. Usually in order to legally take your money they will have a forfeiture hearing.You haqve to show up to dispute the officers or the judgement will be against you. Also they usually have to show the money was the proceeds from illegal activity. Something to watch out for is not being notified. Thats a trick they use in my state. Also as you can tell the police use less than honorable tactics, so any information they give you is suspect. Retain a lawyer and have him handle this. Do not contact the detective and ask questions they are not there to help you, and working with them will get you nowhere. goodluck.
  #7  
Old 09-23-2009, 10:08 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by CypressRyan View Post
"Drug addict"..haha way to label the guy, how much on a bet it was cannabis?

Get a lawyer regardless..make the justice system work to keep your money.
Last time I checked cannabis was still an illegal drug. The lawyer you are going to have to pay for to get that $2300 back is going to cost double that, great idea.
  #8  
Old 09-24-2009, 03:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERAUPIKE View Post
Last time I checked cannabis was still an illegal drug. The lawyer you are going to have to pay for to get that $2300 back is going to cost double that, great idea.
Consentual Sodomy was against the law in 14 states prior to 03'. Blindly following unnessesary and foolish laws is a waste of democracy. Also thinking $4600 for a lawyer to take that case is beyond reasonable. Bad economies are not selective, lawyers need work too.
__________________
Support H.R.5843
  #9  
Old 09-24-2009, 04:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by CypressRyan View Post
Consentual Sodomy was against the law in 14 states prior to 03'. Blindly following unnessesary and foolish laws is a waste of democracy. Also thinking $4600 for a lawyer to take that case is beyond reasonable. Bad economies are not selective, lawyers need work too.
The correct spelling is consensual, but at least you can do math. Please, go waste your time elsewhere. This is not a forum for arguing the legalization of sodomy or marijuana.
  #10  
Old 09-25-2009, 08:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERAUPIKE View Post
The correct spelling is consensual, but at least you can do math. Please, go waste your time elsewhere. This is not a forum for arguing the legalization of sodomy or marijuana.
-Cypress
__________________
Support H.R.5843
  #11  
Old 09-28-2009, 09:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Vertiform City
Posts: 5,138

No need to argue


Quote:
Originally Posted by ERAUPIKE View Post
The correct spelling is consensual, but at least you can do math. Please, go waste your time elsewhere. This is not a forum for arguing the legalization of sodomy or marijuana.
Sodomy is legal.
  #12  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:26 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
Sodomy is legal.
Correct but while sodomy laws are unconstitutional and unenforceable, some states still attempt to enforce their laws. ( i.e.Virginia, Oklahoma, and North Carolina.) The U.S. Military enforces its sodomy regulation without regard to Lawrence.
  #13  
Old 09-28-2009, 10:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Vertiform City
Posts: 5,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERAUPIKE View Post
Correct but while sodomy laws are unconstitutional and unenforceable, some states still attempt to enforce their laws. ( i.e.Virginia, Oklahoma, and North Carolina.) The U.S. Military enforces its sodomy regulation without regard to Lawrence.
Military regulations are not laws.

Politically motivated red state prosecutors won't change homosexuality's nationwide legal status any more than such people's actions have invalidated the right to abortion on demand - i.e. they haven't... and won't.
__________________
I've often thought of becoming a golf club.
  #14  
Old 09-28-2009, 01:09 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 699
Quote:
Originally Posted by xylene View Post
Military regulations are not laws.

Politically motivated red state prosecutors won't change homosexuality's nationwide legal status any more than such people's actions have invalidated the right to abortion on demand - i.e. they haven't... and won't.
Incorrect, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, military regulations, is also Federal law.

Lawrence held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Lawrence has the effect of invalidating similar laws throughout the United States that purport to criminalize sodomy between consenting same-sex adults acting in private. It also invalidated the application of sodomy laws to heterosexual sex. The issue isn't homosexuality, it is the act of sodomy.

Next time you try to jump in you have a few other options to explore first; know what you are talking about, have a valid point, or just mind your own business. Thanks for trying though.

Last edited by ERAUPIKE; 09-28-2009 at 01:14 PM.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.