Because you appear to not understand the process and you won't be able to ask on the internet during your trial when you're going down in flames for help.So why do I need an attorney if I do not have anything to fight over. I have been charged with Georgia "16-13-2" which I understand is a "Conditional Discharge" for first time offenders of "marijuana Possession of an ounce or less". As this is the case, do I still need an attorney? What difference will it make?
Thanks again.
You may want to understand the full ramifications of a guilty plea. I'm not familiar with Georgia but to venture a guess it may include but is not limited to (ha,ha) substance abuse counselor, drug testing, community service, probation supervision and many others of which you will have to cover the costs. goodluck.So why do I need an attorney if I do not have anything to fight over. I have been charged with Georgia "16-13-2" which I understand is a "Conditional Discharge" for first time offenders of "marijuana Possession of an ounce or less". As this is the case, do I still need an attorney? What difference will it make?
Thanks again.
I agree whole heartedly that the OP needs an attorney. But clerical errors and seat belt issues are indices that the officer was not paying attention. A good defense attorney can use things like that to either win a case or get a better resolution. The OP completely skipped how the encounter went from a traffic stop to a drug arrest. That is important. But he needs to have his case reviewed and handled by a criminal defense attorney.Clerical errors aren't going to mean a hill of beans. Neither are you going to get out of your criminal charge because you felt you should have been treated nicer during the arrest. You can certainly make a complaint to the department, but it will mean nothing to your criminal case (and since you appear to have no damages sustained as a result of the handling, you've got no civil action either).
You need an attorney.
Most likely what you consider "custodial interrogation" wasn't really. Your lawyer probably could have anything that came out after the arrest where Miranda was required suppressed, but it sounds like they didn't really ask you anything related to the crime. Your identifying information (Name, address, occupation, employer) isn't "interrogation."