Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Drunk Driving / DUI / DWI

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-03-2009, 04:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1

Dui


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? PA

Was arrested early this morning for DUI was my first ever offence of any kind not even a parking ticket. Took breathalizer test results were .082 cooperated in every way with officer. Officer advised me to plead guilty and I should be given community service and my record will be expunged. Is this good and correct advice?
  #2  
Old 01-03-2009, 04:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,779
Quote:
Originally Posted by kairre View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? PA

Was arrested early this morning for DUI was my first ever offence of any kind not even a parking ticket. Took breathalizer test results were .082 cooperated in every way with officer. Officer advised me to plead guilty and I should be given community service and my record will be expunged. Is this good and correct advice?
**A: is the officer also an experienced DUI attorney?
  #3  
Old 01-03-2009, 06:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,620

Advice


Don't take advice from a cop arresting you.... Unless it's Carl, of course.
__________________
"I only had a couple of drinks..... there's no way I was impaired!."
  #4  
Old 01-03-2009, 07:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 4
About 9 months ago I got a DUI in PA. There is a program called ARD which you no doubt will be eligible for. You do not need a lawyer to do this but it involves classes, evaluations treatment if necessary and etc. At the end of one year it can be expunged.

Depending on your personal circumstances a lawyer may be able to deal with this low amonut of BAC in some other way but I am not certain. Hope this helps.
  #5  
Old 01-03-2009, 10:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 649
.082???? That's just .002 over. I would sure like to see the calibration records for that breathalyzer. That's pretty damn close...
  #6  
Old 01-04-2009, 01:56 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_bo View Post
.082???? That's just .002 over. I would sure like to see the calibration records for that breathalyzer. That's pretty damn close...
An individual may not drive, operate or be in actual physical control of the movement of a vehicle after imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the individual's blood or breath is at least 0.08% but less than 0.10% within two hours after the individual has driven, operated or been in actual physical control of the movement of the vehicle.

If you read the statute he is actually .03 over.
__________________
"In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed."

William Ernest Henley 1875
  #7  
Old 01-04-2009, 02:38 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 626
Quote:
imbibing a sufficient amount of alcohol such that the alcohol concentration in the individual's blood or breath is at least 0.08%
and how the hell is anyone to know when they are at .079 vs .082?
  #8  
Old 01-04-2009, 02:41 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by paguy88 View Post
and how the hell is anyone to know when they are at .079 vs .082?
I think the point is to avoid the whole situation altogether. A general rule to follow is 3 drinks a night, 0 drinks if you are driving. This will keep you nice and clear of that oh so fine line.
__________________
"In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed."

William Ernest Henley 1875
  #9  
Old 01-04-2009, 09:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by paguy88 View Post
and how the hell is anyone to know when they are at .079 vs .082?
You misunderstand the law. It's illegal to drive intoxicated. The intent is not to allow you to go around at 0.07. All the .08 level does is give a PRESUMPTION of intoxication so they don't need to make a bigger case over it.

The cop is wrong by the way, you don't PLEAD GUILTY first for ARD.
  #10  
Old 01-04-2009, 08:30 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 649
Quote:
Originally Posted by paguy88 View Post
and how the hell is anyone to know when they are at .079 vs .082?
You know that is a really good point. In most vehicle violations, a person could reasonably know where they were with respect to a legal limit (i.e. speed limit). However, with respect to BAC, a person has no real way of knowing. With a maximum allowed BAC of .08, that inherently implies that the law allows for SOME level of alcohol. So, drinking and driving is NOT illegal, drinking to >.08 BAC and driving is illegal. So, how is it reasonable to hold a person to that standard when there is no real way for them to tell if they are .079 or .082??
  #11  
Old 01-04-2009, 08:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_bo View Post
You know that is a really good point. In most vehicle violations, a person could reasonably know where they were with respect to a legal limit (i.e. speed limit). However, with respect to BAC, a person has no real way of knowing. With a maximum allowed BAC of .08, that inherently implies that the law allows for SOME level of alcohol. So, drinking and driving is NOT illegal, drinking to >.08 BAC and driving is illegal. So, how is it reasonable to hold a person to that standard when there is no real way for them to tell if they are .079 or .082??
The way to avoid that is to not push the limits. If you know you have to drive, avoid drinking excessively or at all. There are portable Breathalyzers available at drug stores that are reasonable accurate. I would think for someone that wants to skate that fine line it would be a good investment. For the record, the limit for legal driving is .079. If an individual is driving with a .08 limit they are at the per se limit and therefore legally intoxicated.
__________________
"In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed."

William Ernest Henley 1875
  #12  
Old 01-04-2009, 08:59 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13

i have all the answers


i believe you can still be prosecuted for being under .08, but it would be much harder for them to win the case. let's say you are at .04 and swerving around, they could certainly throw some charges at you. even if they don't stick, you still have to fork over 2 Gs to a lawyer, is it really worth it?

now consider another scenario, lets say you are at .02 or .04 and some other A-hole on the road causes an accident because people on 76 are complete retards. but this person is stone sober, and someone innocent is killed in the crash

how do you think this is going to look in court? oh someone went out drinking, got into an accident, and someone died. they will blame you first

there really is no way to win at drinking and driving, and the penalties are much higher than the actual damage you may cause. i love to drink as much as the next person, but i've learned the hard way that there is no amount that is safe to drink and drive

the whole .08 thing causes more confusion than anything, because people don't know how to estimate it. those with high tolerance could be at .10 and arguably be more capable to drive then a senior citizen at .02. but the law doesnt care about these details, and there is nothing you can do about it

if you still want to play the numbers game i can give you some hard and fast rules. your body can metabolize one drink per hour, and each drink is .02. so if i drink 4 beers in one hour i will be at .08 except .02 will be metabolized off leaving me at .06. you can use this formula to determine when it is safe to drive again, but always be advised, the law will try to F you at any chance it gets. yes the PA court houses need more plasma TVs, and no better way to finance that by collecting ARD fines!
  #13  
Old 01-05-2009, 12:16 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mojave Desert, CA
Posts: 649
xarfox,

Interesting.... I almost agree with most of your post. However, I believe that a healty young person with a .08BAC could drive MUCH better than many senior citizens on the road. However, alcohol is an accepted evil... old age is not. Don't get me wrong, stupid people get drunk to the point where they clearly are dangerous. However, an arbitrary level of .08 is based far more on politics than it is on safety.

I do have issue with your last paragraph. I think that 4 beers in an hour producing a BAC of .06 may be true of a man who is 8 feet tall and weighs 375 pounds. But for us mere mortals, 4 beers in an hour is very likely to have us well over the limit.
  #14  
Old 01-05-2009, 09:08 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,620

Per se "legal limit"


Quote:
and how the hell is anyone to know when they are at .079 vs .082?
Exactly why I think the "legal limit" is unfair. Abolish the per se legal limit, make it 0.00 then we all know where we stand when we have a few and choose to drive. That or make a breathalizyer standard equipment on vehicles.
__________________
"I only had a couple of drinks..... there's no way I was impaired!."
  #15  
Old 01-05-2009, 10:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMistakeFl View Post
Exactly why I think the "legal limit" is unfair. Abolish the per se legal limit, make it 0.00 then we all know where we stand when we have a few and choose to drive. That or make a breathalizyer standard equipment on vehicles.
It's not unfair. If you want to be safe, don't DRINK AND DRIVE. Anything between 0 and 0.08 is gray area. Above that you are presumed intoxicated. If you are stupid enough to believe you can drink whatever you calculate will bring you to 0.0799999999 you're too recklessly stupid to drive.

Move to DC, what you propose is actually the law there. You say you have drunk anything (even one) and you will be arrested for DUI.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.