Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Drunk Driving / DUI / DWI

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-04-2005, 05:27 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3

PA dui


What is the name of your state?PA

Is it considered a refusal if u refuse to take the breathalyzer test in the field, but take a blood test at the station/hospital?

Is there a minimum amount of blood that needs to be taken to have a valid blood test?
  #2  
Old 07-08-2005, 12:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
bump bump bump
  #3  
Old 07-08-2005, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam1112
Is it considered a refusal if u refuse to take the breathalyzer test in the field, but take a blood test at the station/hospital?
The law in PA might vary a bit, but here are general practices.

The field test is properly called a PBT, not a "breathalyzer". The term refers to a nearly obsolete breath test device.

The PBT is not evidentiary, it is only used to build probable cause to arrest. Not taking the PBT test will not qualify you for a Refusal in most cases.

The evidentiary tests would be the breath test at the station, a blood draw done by a medical professional, or in rare instances, a urine test.

Note that a blood test does not have to be done at a hospital. A qualified Jail staff nurse would also be sufficient.
Quote:
Is there a minimum amount of blood that needs to be taken to have a valid blood test?
If they take a full pint, they are required to provide cookies and orange juice.

Two vials (short test tubes) are the norm.
  #4  
Old 07-08-2005, 01:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks for the help.

Could too little blood throw off the results? When trying to draw blood, the nurse had trouble getting any. After about 2 min of trying, she finally found a vein and proceeded to draw some blood. For whatever reason, not much came and she stopped after barely filling any in a small vial. She looked at it and said this should be enough (i think her exact words were it is almost to the line, we should be fine). I asked this because i just got the results and they were .095 The officer was kind enough to let me blow into a device, probably the PBT you were talking about, and it came out at .07 I know the PBT is probably just less accurate, but being off by .025 seems to be too big of a difference.
  #5  
Old 07-08-2005, 02:11 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam1112
Could too little blood throw off the results?
No.

Either there is enough to test, or there isn't. Not enough blood means no test, no results.
Quote:
I asked this because i just got the results and they were .095 The officer was kind enough to let me blow into a device, probably the PBT you were talking about, and it came out at .07 I know the PBT is probably just less accurate, but being off by .025 seems to be too big of a difference.
The PBT results can sometimes vary a bit... That's why it's not recognized as evidentiary.

However, any of the various breath tests will always show slightly lower results than a blood draw. That would easily account for the difference.
  #6  
Old 07-08-2005, 07:03 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 360
Your lawyer can request to have a sample tested independently. In fact in most states (not sure about PA), you have every legal right to get a sample of the blood they obtained. I would strongly suggest you have your lawyer look into the possiblity of doing so. And if so, get it tested at another lab.
  #7  
Old 07-15-2005, 04:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,270
PA has the "Implied Consent" law, here is a page with the details:

[url]http://www.familylawyerservice.com/consent.htm[/url]

If you are pulled over by an officer and asked to take a breath test, the officer is actually looking for probable cause to see if you are driving under the influence. In Pennsylvania, the Implied Consent law requires you to submit to the breath test, or even a urine test or blood test if the officer decides to make you take one.

While you did cooperate with the blood testing, by refusing the breath test, they could argue that you were non-cooperative and suspend your license for a year. You can try to fight it, but it has happened more than once in PA, since this law was enacted. Your smartest bet is to coooperate fully with the officers and take any test they request of you.

They have successfully argued in court many times already that the other tests would not have been necessary or requested, had you submitted to the breath test, unless they had reason to believe your blood alcohol levels were high. By refusing the breath test, you could have just screwed yourself out of your license for a year.
__________________
Please remember that the search feature on this site, Google, and websters.com are all your friends!!!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:46 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.