Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE > Drunk Driving / DUI / DWI

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-11-2007, 01:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1

reasonable suspicion


Minnesota

I was recently stopped and arrested for a DUI. I was never told why exactly I was stopped. I was downtown on a Saturday night, so traffic was pretty busy, and I was stopped behind a car on a one-way. I had driven only about half a block on that particular street, and when I stopped there were about 3-4 police officers standing in the parking lane to my left. I'm not really sure what they were doing exactly. After a few seconds one of the officers approached my car and knocked on the window. I opened it, and the first thing he asked me if I had been drinking. I said yes, he asked me to exit the car, had me do the field tests, etc. I know that I wasn't speeding or weaving in and out of lanes (I had only been on the street for about half a block, like I said, in that one lane), my tail lights/license light are all fine, there's nothing dangling from my windshield, and "sobriety checkpoints" aren't legal in Minnesota. No one told me why I was stopped and I wasn't cited for a traffic violation. Does this sound legal? Under what circumstances would it be a legal stop? My lawyer is obtaining the police report, so I'll know what the officer claimed soon, but it just doesn't seem right to me.

Thanks,
  #2  
Old 09-11-2007, 01:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: California
Posts: 18,460
Send a message via AIM to CdwJava Send a message via Yahoo to CdwJava
If you have an attorney, he should be able to answer some of those questions - especially when he gets the report.

It could be that it will be considered a consensual contact. A cop can ask you any question you want. If he speaks to you, smells the odor of alcohol, sees what might be the objective symptoms of impairment, and then asks you to do some FSTs, that could be perfectly legal.

As you said, it will depend on what the report has to say.

- Carl
__________________
A Nor Cal Cop Sergeant

"Make mine a double mocha ...
And a croissant!"

He Who Kneels Before God
Can Stand Before Anyone

....author unknown
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.