![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
additional statutes?I had stopped in the road to parallel park my car into an empty metered parking space. After I stopped, I looked behind me to verify there was no car behind me then proceeded to back into (parallel park) the space. As I was backing my car into the space I was hit, or I hit, a car that had popped up behind me. I never saw the car approaching. I believe it turned into the driving lane from an adjacent parking lot which has an exit within 20 feet of the location where the accident occurred. The insurance company has deemed this accident to be my fault citing AZ statute: 28-891. Backing limitations A. The driver of a vehicle shall not back the vehicle unless the movement can be made with reasonable safety and without interfering with other traffic. Adherence to this statute would prohibit access to probably 90% of parallel parking spaces in an urban setting like Tempe, AZ in which this accident occurred. Is there another statute which would require a driver to allow a car to parallel park, even though they are obstructing forward progress of traffic in that lane? Both cars were insured by State Farm in Arizona. I’m assuming I have a higher deductible ($1,000) then the other driver whic could be a factor in their determination of fault. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
However, for that to apply, would require you to successfully argue that you had 'possession' of the lane when they approached and hit you. If they were stationary and you backed into them while trying to parallel park, forget that 'defense' option.
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution). Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Any reversing vehicle must always yield to traffic moving forward. Posession of the lane is irrelevent, a reversing vehicle CAN NOT have the right of way over one going forward. This doesn't remove access to parking spaces, it merely means you can't start backing up until it is safe to do so. It also means you should make sure that you can SEE behind you before you start backing up. |
![]() |