• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Done The Homework...what Would You Suggest?

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

teriblehm

Junior Member
WASHINGTON STATE[FONT=Arial


[B]
Washington State[/B]


This will outline facts chronologically.



2-1996-After a three year tenancy, the tenant was given illegal notice to vacate property by agent of property owner. KING county landlords are required by law to give reason. Agent refused. Trial scheduled for July of 1996.

3-1996 Agent of owner of unit finds painted cabinet faces. Tenant painted faces due to yellowing-blackening from carbon monoxide soot. (Soot residue, unknown at that time by anyone to be carbon monoxide soot) was claimed by agent to be cigarette smoke damage. Tenant did not smoke. Carpet damage was included in his claim.

4-1996-Gas Company hired by agent of owner to inspect fireplace. 6 months after being alerted by condo association. Tenant-survivor mentally shut down April 1996 when gas company orange tagged unit and pointed out soot damage. Tenant contacted legal counsel of carbon monoxide findings-attorney then shared document discovery.

4-96 Discovery of document made 4-96. An 11-2005 condo association warning to landlord to check fireplace. Danger to tenant is emphasized to agent and owner. Tenant had no knowledge of this danger until attorney informed of document!


7-1996-Agent presented that his eviction was based on this damage. Judge was distracted from the true purpose of the hearing because of the agents' legal counsel's tactics. Tenants legal counsel did not make any attempt to introduce justified reason to tenants actions that were discovered by agent of owner in March of 1996-one month after 2-1996 illegal eviction was extended to tenant. Agent was responsible for miselleneous illegal actions against tenant. Coming to her work-harrassing her, changing locks, entering without permission, etc.


2-1997-Carbon Monoxide Testing Report ordered by state for rehabilitation program.

9-1999-Multiple Sclerosis diagnosed. No family history to support genetic factor that provides the gene top enable MS as then known.

8-2005-Survivor does not see report until 8-2005. Survivor sufferring from PTSD (1987 house fire-owner). Begins recalling trauma of that time period. Repressed memory is triggered by reading report. Open claim on landlord's insurance? Check into it.

9-2005-Survivor verifies memory by contacting landlord insurance company. Claim is still open. Actual damage recovery and agent of owner actions are focus. Insurance company does not know these possible intentions.

9-2005-Stem Cell Research discovery worldwide September 2004 toxin triggered auto immune affects-Lupis, Rhuematoid Arthritus, Multiple Sclerosis, fybromyalgia, etc.

Survisor has never put these two facts together until this information was discovered. Research shows more than likely than not probability. MS is now considered to be triggered by toxin or heriditary factors. Chemical sensitivity in survivors medical history. Dr. Morton Oregon specialist environmental health-survivors doctor.

Survivor treated for mental health issues 1996 until 1999 MS diagnosis.

10-2005-Hazardous materials statute 10 years. 7 months remain to file claim in the courts. Carbon Monoxide #10 on government list of hazardous materials.

At present, I, (the survivor of carbon monoxide) have an open claim on the [property owner's insurance that I am in a dilemma about only because I am not in a mental capacity to approach the intimidating demeanor of the insurance adjuster representing the property owner. Revisiting this will be devastating to me. Talking with MY INSURANCE COMPANY is really all I am capable of handling right now.

My renter's insurance opened a new claim as it was their professional opinion that I was mis represented by them in helping me with my claim. There was no subrogation of owner's policy. I did not receive full compensation of my policy which only covered an eigth of actual loss from the soot.

My question is quite simple. I have done my homework and am still faced with which way to proceed. Make claim for agent’s negligence and have an attorney handle it for me if it goes into a litigious arena? Pursue the toxin exposure research. Claim compensation for actual loss of $250,000 plus property damage in addition to claiming injuries from harassment and neglect of the agent. Input is appreciated.
:eek:
 


BelizeBreeze

Senior Member
Please hold up the court transcript, your lease, all relevant findings and inspections including all witness interviews and medical records and then we'll give you an opinion.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top