Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Family Law Archive : This Forum is no longer accepting new Questions. You can Answer existing Questions. Please post new Questions in other Family Law Forums.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Family Law Archive

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2000, 03:38 AM
laralu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

I am in a pickle about someone else's problem. This is a legal AND moral question. My boyfriend was married before and has a 5 year old daughter. His Xwife has full custody and did not cooperate on letting him visit the girl (he was also in the Army so he was away a lot). Stupidly, he did not fight for his rights at that time in the correct way although he did make many efforts to see the daughter. In frustration with the whole situation and all the fights w/ the X over it, he slumped into depression and decided to let the fight go. This was 3-4 years ago (and he has now not been a physical part of the girl's life since she was 1 year old). He has continued to pay child support however. Now, he has left the Army is trying to improve his life, and get out of the debt the whole divorce thing has caused. He was just going to look into trying to get his X to comply w/ or modify visitation when she recently contacted him and asked him if he would allow her new (and third) husband to adopt the child. He has agreed to this. These are his reasons: 1. He is VERY financially unstable now and lives in a different state from the X and daughter (realistically it may be a long battle) 2. He feels his not having been a part of the daughter's life does not help his case for asking for more visitation rights, etc.(since the daughter does not know him) 3. (Most important to him), he knows the X will fight tooth and nail with him and play with the girl's mind about him being a bad person/father (he has seen his X do this about the father of her other daughter from a her previous marriage), 4. and even though he hates losing his child and letting the X "win" he knows his daughter is in good hands. He feels it is in the best interest of the child to concede defeat and allow her to have a stable home environment that she is already used to and to spare the child a nasty legal battle and possible psychological endangerment. He hopes when she is older, they can be reunited. So Fathers (and others, my legal question is: is his case as hopeless as he makes it sound? Also, what do you think about his "best interest" idea? Moral question: Is he just giving up too soon or could the kid actually be better off?
  #2  
Old 11-02-2000, 10:43 AM
Ukiah
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

You can't force someone to do something they have already given up on.

Don't think for one minute that if you and he were in the same situation he'd just walk away from that child. Maybe if you and he were to get married and have a child, he may want to be there for that child and be a great father because he already knows how important it is to keep the relationship with the child.

He probably feels very badly about not doing what he should have done in the first place. Ask him if he honestly wants to have the relationship with his child, if he says yes, then tell him you will help in every way. If he says no it's too late, then let it go. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink......
  #3  
Old 11-02-2000, 04:23 PM
laralu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ukiah:
[B]You can't force someone to do something they have already given up on...

Thanks Ukiah for answering. I guess I asked the question becuase in my value system he should be SURE his hands are truly tied before making such as lasting decision. That is why I was curious if any of you knew if there was something more legally he could do or some hope. But I guess the whole thing can be a bit draining when youre actually going through this and you have to weigh the costs. Thanks for your response. Maybe others will respond and add their perspective.

  #4  
Old 11-03-2000, 10:15 AM
Agent Orange
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

.
  #5  
Old 11-03-2000, 10:21 AM
usdeeper
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The problem with the system is that it comes down to money. The problems he is facing with visitation are easily fixed if you have 5k a year for legal fees. If you have no money then it comes down to how quickly he can educate himself in the system and learn how to do all of this himself. How to prepare the forms, file them, present the petition to a judge etc..

PAS is the real danger, it is very difficult to prove and is absolutely damning in its effect. If you are able to prove it, then you have grounds for a change in custody but the child is already so against the NCP then life is hell.

Basically, when the NCP has no money and the CP is mean and controlling, then a relationship with the child is going to be VERY difficult.. some would say impossible.

But, who is to say that in 2 years time the NCP has not got a good job, a nice home, good income and is finally in a position to fight ?
  #6  
Old 11-08-2000, 01:32 AM
laralu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

(This is a delayed reaction) Thanks usdeeper. Thanks for your insight. Incidently, my boyfriend has decided to NOT give the child up for adoption and will try to fight for her even if he will have to wait two years befroe he can do it. Thanks again.
 



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.