Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Family Law Archive : This Forum is no longer accepting new Questions. You can Answer existing Questions. Please post new Questions in other Family Law Forums.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Family Law Archive

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-28-2000, 01:12 PM
BAC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

The state is PA. Three and a half years ago, my boyfriend's wife left him and their children for another man. She lives with her boyfriend, and they both work. My boyfriend has continued to live in the house and pay the mortgage on his own, even though it is in both his and her name. Up until last October, he had full custody of the kids and she paid him child support. Since October, they have had shared custody of two of the children, and the wife has had full custody of the older daughter, so now he pays her support. Now he can barely pay his bills, and the only reason he has been able to pay the bills on time is because he received $$$ from his tax return. Sooner or later, that money will be gone, and he will have more money going out to pay the bills than he has coming in. Is there any way he can legally make her pay back 1/2 of what he has paid for the last three and a half years and/or assume responsiblity for 1/2 of the payments now? The divorce has not been finalized yet because they are in dispute over the property settlement.
  #2  
Old 05-28-2000, 05:19 PM
lawrat
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I am a law school graduate. What I offer is mere information, not to be construed as forming an attorney client relationship.

Basically, it depends on if your state follows community property law or not. But generally speaking, if they are living separate and apart and there is no indicia of married life, what she has not paid in that house, is his. Ie.. when they divorce there will be an equitable accounting and he will get more, simply because she did not contribute.

He will not get anything now, but should put all the paperwork together for the lawyers to sift through.

may i suggest reading the family law section and all subsections at freeadvice.com's homepage.
hope this helps.

  #3  
Old 05-29-2000, 09:55 AM
BAC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Two problems:

#1 - He needs financial relief now. He can't wait until the divorce and property settlements are final. Sooner or later, his $$$ from tax return and other savings will be gone and he will not be able to pay all of the bills with his paycheck alone. That's why I asked if there was any way he can legally make her responsible for 1/2 of the mortage payments now. Who knows how long this is going to drag out?

#2 - You said that "when they divorce there will be an equitable accounting and he will get more, simply because she did not contribute." Well, that's what we were thinking too. Although PA is an "equitable distribution" state, sometimes things are not equitably distributed at all. Much of it is up to the judge's discretion. On top of that, his ex has said that she will claim "fair rental value" from him, and that the "fair rental value" will cancel out all of the $$$ he has spent on the mortgage and other things to maintain the home. There is nothing in the PA statutes for equitable distribution regarding fair rental value. I assume it is something that is, again, up to the judge. I can see where the "fair rental value" would come into play in a lot of instances, such as when one of the spouses is evicted by the other spouse, but do you think a judge would allow her fair rental value in the equitable distribution equation, even though she is the one who left willingly to be with her boyfriend? She also abandoned her children, and they lived in the house with him. Do you know if there is some kind of criteria a judge uses to decide whether or not to allow fair rental value, or is it just on a case by case basis? More importantly, do you think a judge will allow her fair rental value, based on the above info?
  #4  
Old 05-29-2000, 10:43 PM
Tracey
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Fair rental value should not be an issue between co-owners of property. Each owner is entitled to live in the house. If she chooses not to live there, that's her problem. She doesn't get rewarded for it too.

However, if he can't make the mortgage payment, he's in 'too much house.' He needs ask that the house be sold and the proceeds split. Alternatively, he needs to resume custody of the 3 kids and get CS again.

------------------
This is not legal advice and you are not my client. Double check everything with your own attorney and your state's laws.
 



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:21 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.