Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Family Law Archive : This Forum is no longer accepting new Questions. You can Answer existing Questions. Please post new Questions in other Family Law Forums.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Family Law Archive

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2000, 10:42 PM
ann42
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

My husband, who has received Social Security benefits for over a year, got a letter yesterday saying that my daughter (his stepdaughter) is not eligible to receive benefits through him anymore. He had applied for her to receive benefits after the lady at our local SS office said that all of his children, plus his stepdaughter, were eligible. SS is now requesting that we pay back ALL of the benefits paid to her since last year!

When he called SS, they said it had to do with whether he "supported" her or not. The SS person asked if child support on her is paid from her dad (yes) and then asked, "Do you get along with your ex-wife?" which we thought was an odd question.

My husband plans to appeal this, but why would SS take away these benefits if they originally said she was eligible for them? Could his ex-wife have filed some sort of request for SS to reconsider his stepdaughter's benefits? Should we see a lawyer?
  #2  
Old 11-09-2000, 01:11 AM
Invisible Blonde
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ann42:
[b]My husband, who has received Social Security benefits for over a year, got a letter yesterday saying that my daughter (his stepdaughter) is not eligible to receive benefits through him anymore. He had applied for her to receive benefits after the lady at our local SS office said that all of his children, plus his stepdaughter, were eligible. SS is now requesting that we pay back ALL of the benefits paid to her since last year!

When he called SS, they said it had to do with whether he "supported" her or not. The SS person asked if child support on her is paid from her dad (yes) and then asked, "Do you get along with your ex-wife?" which we thought was an odd question.

My husband plans to appeal this, but why would SS take away these benefits if they originally said she was eligible for them? Could his ex-wife have filed some sort of request for SS to reconsider his stepdaughter's benefits? Should we see a lawyer?[/b]<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>


His ex wife probably did just as you suspect. My understanding is that each child is given XX amount of $$$ per month not to exceed 150% of the disabled persons benefits. So if your daughter(the step daughter) is receiving benefits based on his disability she (his ex) is not getting as much in benefits for their children that she would if your daughter wasnt receiving payments.

I went ahead and looked up the requirements for a stepchild to receive disability benefits and this is what I came up with:

331. Stepchild-stepparent relationship.
IN GENERAL, A STEPCHILD-STEPPARENT RELATIONSHIP ARISES WHEN the worker:

Marries the child's natural parent; or
Marries the child's adopting parent after the adoption.
If the stepparent dies, there is no termination of a child's existing entitlement to stepchild's benefits. However, if the child's parent and stepparent obtain a final divorce in or after 7/96, the child's existing entitlement to stepchild's benefits will terminate the month after the month in which the divorce becomes final.

A stepchild must have been a stepchild of the parent on whose Social Security record the claim for benefits is filed for at least 1 year before the day the child's application is filed if the parent is alive.

To qualify for survivors benefits, a stepchild must have been the stepchild of the insured worker for at least 9 months immediately preceding the day on which the worker died, unless the worker and the child's natural or adopting parent were previously married, divorced, and then remarried at the time of the worker's death, and the 9-month duration-of-relationship requirement was met at the time of the divorce. If the death of the worker was accidental or occurred in the line of duty while a member of a uniformed service serving on active duty, the 9-month requirement may be considered satisfied, unless at the time of the marriage, the worker could not have been expected to live for 9 months. (See §404 for an explanation of the exception to the 9-month duration-of-marriage requirement.) The evidence required to establish the relationships described above is set forth in §§1707-1717.

You can find this info yourself at:
[url="http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/handbook/handbook.03/hbk-0331.htm"]http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/handbook/handbook.03/hbk-0331.htm[/url]

[This message has been edited by Invisible Blonde (edited November 09, 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Invisible Blonde (edited November 09, 2000).]
 



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is Off
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.