Luckywisconsin
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (owinly U.S. law)? Wisconsin
Luckywisconsin, you can add your legal question to your original post by using the "edit post" feature found at the bottom, or you can simply "reply to thread" and add your question that way. Thanks.What is the name of your state (owinly U.S. law)? Wisconsin
I had notified my supervisor at the start of the new year that my insurance deduction was not being taken from my by-weekly paycheck, and was told it would be corrected. The premium was paid by my employer, but after numerous notifications to my supervisor and her supervisor, no deduction was taken. Today (11 months later)my supervisor tells me that the "missing" health insurance deductions will be taken out of my next check. The deduction will leave me with a payroll check under 20 dollars. I was told since the company had paid my premium over the 11 months, I had to pay my share before the end of the year, and they would not make the deduction spread out over time, as the deduction form I signed stated. Suggestions needed to work with employer to have a payment option over time, since error was brought to their attention numerous times, and they neglected to correctly follow my signed payroll deduction.What is the name of your state (owinly U.S. law)? Wisconsin
Yes, really, why did you spend all that money that you knew should belong to the insurance company?Alas, they're probably right. You should have been saving up those omitted withdrawals for this eventuality.
I do have the bi-weekly insurance deduction in a savings account, so it is not the idea that I have to pay what is owed, it is the lack of follow through by my employer after 20 notifications that the deduction was not being taken in those 20 bi-weekly checks, and they chose to wait until the end of the year to correct the error. Also, the bi-weekly deduction was to be a pre-tax deduction and I have been told this single deduction will be post-tax. So my question is, an employer can ignore a signed payroll deduction and 20 verbal and 20 email notices that the deduction was not made snd basically do whatever they want to collect the authorized deduction they failed to make, and not follow the pre-tax deduction. I thought there was a law that a payroll check can not be less than the minimum wage x the number of hours worked.Alas, they're probably right. You should have been saving up those omitted withdrawals for this eventuality.
It should not be. Check again to make sure they have understood that.. Also, the bi-weekly deduction was to be a pre-tax deduction and I have been told this single deduction will be post-tax.
They could deduct the health insurance every December 31 as far as the law is concern. There's no requirement for it to be done periodically.So my question is, an employer can ignore a signed payroll deduction and 20 verbal and 20 email notices that the deduction was not made snd basically do whatever they want to collect the authorized deduction they failed to make,
There's no requirement that it be pre-tax either, but you can probably assert that if that is what you signed up for or if they would do so pretax in the ordinary case, that you have a contract (implied or explicit) that yours would be done that way as well.and not follow the pre-tax deduction.
You thought wrong. Nearly everybody working minimum wage ges a check smaller than the minimum wage x hours worked. At the minimum they have the SS tax withheld (except for the tiny few that are exempt). The employer can't "dock" you down below the minimum wage, but withholding for taxes and any benefits you've signed up for certainly are fair game to reduce your check.I thought there was a law that a payroll check can not be less than the minimum wage x the number of hours worked.
Thanks for the infoThe deduction should still be pre-tax.