CdwJava
Senior Member
The sections you allegedly violated don't require a "hazard." They require that you failed to properly stop for a red light (VC 21453(a)), you failed to obey a regulatory device or sign (VC 21461(a)), and you failed to stop as required for a railroad crossing (VC 2451(a)). You can go to court and allege that you DID stop, obey the signs, and stop 15 feet away and did not proceed across the track until it was safe to do so. You will have your say, the officer will have his, and the judge will render a decision.Hello everyone,
I seem to have cause a stir and that was not my intention. And I never said the quotas was the reasons why I'm fighting my ticket. It was merely a statement saying policy officer makes more money than people think. That is all. I did not state he didn't deserve that amount nor that my reason to fight this unjust ticket. Nor did I whine about my tax dollar to supplement his income.
If you read what I had written aside from his salary that the ticket I received claimed I STOP on the railroad. According to the violations, as long I'm cautious and there was is no indication of any hazard.
If you lose, it is likely that you will not be permitted to take traffic school, but, TS is still possible even if you lose at trial. You also have the option to seek a trial by written declaration first, and THEN seek a new trial (trial de novo) should you lose.
Oh, and was YOU that brought up the salary issue. If not to try and make a claim that the officer was somehow making bank on writing citations and thus implying he has a motive to lie, why, then, bring up what he might make?