Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > INSURANCE > Health Insurance and HMO Plans

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2009, 03:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6

Coordination of benefits - HRA and PPO


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Kentucky

I am covered by two different insurance plans from two different companies until the end of next month. The plan I will be losing is a PPO plan with office visit and prescription copays and 10% coinsurance. The other plan that I have is an HRA. Where I entered into it late, I was only allotted $583 of the normally $1000 yearly amount. I then have a $1500 bridge until everything is covered 100%. Thus far I have been putting my PPO plan as primary but am wondering if that makes the most sense. It looks like they are both being billed for the same thing and both paying out the contracted amount, so it's rapidly depleting my HRA. I thought just the copay would be deducted from the HRA. Would it be better to make my HRA primary? If I deplete the balance, will my PPO plan make up the difference and would that amount count towards the bridge? I'm trying to figure out what would be best for my situation since the HRA will be the only coverage I have after next month. I have some diagnostic imaging being done here in the next couple of weeks and may need an endoscopy done as well, so this will run through my HRA funds pretty quick.
Thanks!

Last edited by automagrt; 08-22-2009 at 03:41 PM.
  #2  
Old 08-23-2009, 10:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,739
YOU don't decide which plan is primary. Where are the plans coming from? Are they group plans or individual?
__________________
Lawsuits are not about justice. They are about MONEY. If you don't want money, then you shouldn't be thinking about suing. And people post here because they are thinking about suing. Because they want money, no matter how much they don't want to admit that to themselves.

-Auto insurance adjuster for 2 years - as of 6/15/09, I am FREE!
  #3  
Old 08-23-2009, 11:15 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
They are group plans. The doctor's office, hospital, etc. always ask me which is primary, that's why I thought it was up to me. So who does decide? The insurance companies? I am just going to call them and ask about it as I had a question about some of the claims. I figured it would be an exercise in futility as they would both try to get me to make the other primary, but I guess it doesn't work that way. I've tried reading through the Coordination of Benefits section of one of my plan's booklets but it really doesn't tell me anything useful.
  #4  
Old 08-24-2009, 09:10 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,739
OK who are the group plans through? Your employer? Your spouse's employer?
__________________
Lawsuits are not about justice. They are about MONEY. If you don't want money, then you shouldn't be thinking about suing. And people post here because they are thinking about suing. Because they want money, no matter how much they don't want to admit that to themselves.

-Auto insurance adjuster for 2 years - as of 6/15/09, I am FREE!
  #5  
Old 08-24-2009, 10:42 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecmst12 View Post
OK who are the group plans through? Your employer? Your spouse's employer?
They are both through my employers. I'm working for two different employers until the end of next month, at which point I will be losing the PPO plan when I go part-time. The deductible has already been met on that one, if that makes any difference.
  #6  
Old 08-24-2009, 11:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,739
If they are both plans through employers you are actively working for, then whichever one has been in effect longer should be primary.
__________________
Lawsuits are not about justice. They are about MONEY. If you don't want money, then you shouldn't be thinking about suing. And people post here because they are thinking about suing. Because they want money, no matter how much they don't want to admit that to themselves.

-Auto insurance adjuster for 2 years - as of 6/15/09, I am FREE!
  #7  
Old 08-24-2009, 12:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,673
"Should be" is key. I did a lot of research on the COB issue and it is suprisingly difficult to find legal opinions on the matter. I did finally find an insurance industry set of guidelines (which I posted here probably a year or a year and a half ago), but that is hardly legal precedent.
__________________
When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.
--W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne)
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.