What is the name of your state? Tennessee
I have an infant son who is requiring ear tubes be placed in both ears due to fluid accumulation. My insurance is trying to refuse to pay for the procedure because at 2 months of age (3 months before we had coverage with this insurance) he had 1 ear infection. They are claiming that due to this one infection his condition was pre-existing prior to our date of coverage.
The infection he had was self-limiting, resolved with one course of antibiotics, and he had no other problems until he was 6 months old (a month and a half AFTER our coverage began). Since and including the infection at 6 months old, he has had fluid accumulation in his eardrum which has led to 3 additional infections and, if left untreated, could render him with hearing loss and delayed speech development.
When we applied for coverge with this insurance they did a complete medical review to determine if there were any pre-existing conditions for anyone in my family and they made no clauses for my son even though they knew about the one ear infection at that time.
Are they allowed to now claim that his condition was a pre-existing condition even though they did not classify it as such when our coverage was issued?
Can they deny him coverage for this procedure because they now say that the one ear infection was a symptom of his current condition even though it did not cause or have any bearing whatsoever on the fluid accumulation that has caused the need for this operation?
I have an infant son who is requiring ear tubes be placed in both ears due to fluid accumulation. My insurance is trying to refuse to pay for the procedure because at 2 months of age (3 months before we had coverage with this insurance) he had 1 ear infection. They are claiming that due to this one infection his condition was pre-existing prior to our date of coverage.
The infection he had was self-limiting, resolved with one course of antibiotics, and he had no other problems until he was 6 months old (a month and a half AFTER our coverage began). Since and including the infection at 6 months old, he has had fluid accumulation in his eardrum which has led to 3 additional infections and, if left untreated, could render him with hearing loss and delayed speech development.
When we applied for coverge with this insurance they did a complete medical review to determine if there were any pre-existing conditions for anyone in my family and they made no clauses for my son even though they knew about the one ear infection at that time.
Are they allowed to now claim that his condition was a pre-existing condition even though they did not classify it as such when our coverage was issued?
Can they deny him coverage for this procedure because they now say that the one ear infection was a symptom of his current condition even though it did not cause or have any bearing whatsoever on the fluid accumulation that has caused the need for this operation?