Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > INSURANCE > Health Insurance and HMO Plans

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2006, 02:23 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1

Receiving bills from non-par providers (you didn't even know about!)


What is the name of your state? FL

My daughter had outpatient surgery last October at the hospital. The hospital was participating with my insurance. Per my benefits, I am responsible for a $100 copayment only.

Labwork taken during the stay, unbeknownst to me, was sent to a non-participating Pathologist. I received a $220 bill from the Pathologist. My insurance paid $26.46 and the EOB I received actually states "Total Amount You Owe" $0.00". When I called the insurance company to find out if I'm responsible for the balance, I was told yes because the Pathologist is not participating. The EOB seems to contradict this. I filed an appeal but just received the denial in the mail today.

This is not the first time this situation has happened, nor will it be the last. I believe I should be responsible for the bill if I knowingly go to a non-par provider. But when I ensure the provider is par, and then they aren't responsible enough to ensure other billable parties involved aren't, then shouldn't they be responsible for the bill? At the very least, shouldn't the contracted agreement between the insurance company and provider ensure this doesn't happen to the member? I'm furious from all the money I already have to pay for health insurance and visits for my daughter, and then incompetent people cause me to senselessly pay more. I seriously think this should be a class action lawsuit.
  #2  
Old 03-25-2006, 11:44 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 324
When services are rendered you owe. Very few pathologists (and anesthesiologists, medical transport companies, radiologists, etc,) are in network. This means there are no agreements in place to limit what they can charge. Your carrier then reverts to R&C (reasonable & customary) and you are responsible for the balance. If penalties were assessed for out of network charges, you can usually get them waived.

You owe the money. Pay up.
__________________
The answer is no, unless you don't like that answer. Then the answer is probably not in your lifetime.
  #3  
Old 04-19-2006, 12:04 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 457
I would contact the hospital.... we had somethign similar happen to us... although our daughter was inpatient.... everything from her labs to her catscan and MRI's were done my non-part. providers... HOWEVER, our insurance company decided to cover the expenses because the hospital she was admitted to was a participating provider and had contracts with the businesses that rendered services to our daughter, and yet were not PP. Not sure if it applies to you since it was out-patient, but it's worth a try.

Last edited by FLMommy; 04-19-2006 at 12:35 PM.
  #4  
Old 05-09-2006, 01:46 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 231

I feel so lucky now....


Quote:
Originally Posted by gina1756
What is the name of your state? FL

My daughter had outpatient surgery last October at the hospital. The hospital was participating with my insurance. Per my benefits, I am responsible for a $100 copayment only.

Labwork taken during the stay, unbeknownst to me, was sent to a non-participating Pathologist. I received a $220 bill from the Pathologist. My insurance paid $26.46 and the EOB I received actually states "Total Amount You Owe" $0.00". When I called the insurance company to find out if I'm responsible for the balance, I was told yes because the Pathologist is not participating. The EOB seems to contradict this. I filed an appeal but just received the denial in the mail today.

This is not the first time this situation has happened, nor will it be the last. I believe I should be responsible for the bill if I knowingly go to a non-par provider. But when I ensure the provider is par, and then they aren't responsible enough to ensure other billable parties involved aren't, then shouldn't they be responsible for the bill? At the very least, shouldn't the contracted agreement between the insurance company and provider ensure this doesn't happen to the member? I'm furious from all the money I already have to pay for health insurance and visits for my daughter, and then incompetent people cause me to senselessly pay more. I seriously think this should be a class action lawsuit.

JMO.... I feel your pain, I too, just went through this same thing. Went had services done, then to find out that they sent tests to a second lab. Our insurance paid for the first lab but not the second one. There went a quick $105 bucks. And they didn't even offer the vasoline. I was so mad Needless to say, I had to pay
Sorry to hear bout your x-tra bill too.... this was in Fl. too. My second bill was sent to a lab in Tenn. Go figure....
  #5  
Old 05-15-2006, 05:51 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 457
I'm in FL too... I don't think it has anything to do with the state
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.