eerelations
Senior Member
I'll address your points one by one. BTW, I don't see how any of them, separately or all together, amount to age discrimination.
1) Just because your husband is over the age of 40 doesn't mean that his employer can't legally fire him.
2) Branch Managers often have the authority to fire people. I don't know why you think this one shouldn't be allowed to.
3) Given that it would be perfectly legal to fire your husband specifically for being the best, hardest-working, most profitable sales rep in the entire world, I don't know how this affects your case.
4) Hiring the son of a former CEO does not = age discrimination. It = a form of nepotism, which is perfectly legal. Regarding your husband's happy clients, see my response to your point #3.
1) Just because your husband is over the age of 40 doesn't mean that his employer can't legally fire him.
2) Branch Managers often have the authority to fire people. I don't know why you think this one shouldn't be allowed to.
3) Given that it would be perfectly legal to fire your husband specifically for being the best, hardest-working, most profitable sales rep in the entire world, I don't know how this affects your case.
4) Hiring the son of a former CEO does not = age discrimination. It = a form of nepotism, which is perfectly legal. Regarding your husband's happy clients, see my response to your point #3.