What is the name of your state? CA
Hello,
I am a candidate for a higher position in my company. It is not within my current department. At this point, we are in the 4th month of interviewing for the position. Only two people inside the company applied for this job and the job posting states that there is a preference for someone with experience within the company. I meet and exceed all the minimum qualifications and am the only candidate interviewed so far that has experience in all three areas that would fall under that position's responsibilty. Other outside candidates have had usually one, maybe two, but never all three areas of expertise. It seems to be dragging on endlessly for no good reason, and I felt I had to force questions to be asked in my interview that even came close to assessing my skills. One of my colleagues expressed concern to me that he heard the GM that is soley responsible for hiring this Director level position say that I wasn't a serious consideration because he didn't want to have to try to fill my current position if they moved me up. I have been at this company for almost 10 years now and have always gotten good reviews. I feel I am being prevented from moving forward through the system because it would be inconvenient to replace me. However, if want to advance my career now, I would have no choice but to leave, so it doesn't make sense. I just want to see if there are rules or laws governing something of this nature or if it looks like I am wrongfully being held back. It may help to note that all other directors at this company are male.
Thank you-sorry to be long winded.What is the name of your state?
Hello,
I am a candidate for a higher position in my company. It is not within my current department. At this point, we are in the 4th month of interviewing for the position. Only two people inside the company applied for this job and the job posting states that there is a preference for someone with experience within the company. I meet and exceed all the minimum qualifications and am the only candidate interviewed so far that has experience in all three areas that would fall under that position's responsibilty. Other outside candidates have had usually one, maybe two, but never all three areas of expertise. It seems to be dragging on endlessly for no good reason, and I felt I had to force questions to be asked in my interview that even came close to assessing my skills. One of my colleagues expressed concern to me that he heard the GM that is soley responsible for hiring this Director level position say that I wasn't a serious consideration because he didn't want to have to try to fill my current position if they moved me up. I have been at this company for almost 10 years now and have always gotten good reviews. I feel I am being prevented from moving forward through the system because it would be inconvenient to replace me. However, if want to advance my career now, I would have no choice but to leave, so it doesn't make sense. I just want to see if there are rules or laws governing something of this nature or if it looks like I am wrongfully being held back. It may help to note that all other directors at this company are male.
Thank you-sorry to be long winded.What is the name of your state?