• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Being replaced because of pregnancy

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

WhimsicalMe

Junior Member
What is the name of your state? California

There is an employee that works part-time on the weekends and is due to have a baby in early October. The boss told her that they were going to replace her once she has the baby. Can an employer terminate the person because she is only part-time?
 


cbg

I'm a Northern Girl
Yes, if the reason for the termination is her part time status, they can term her.

Being pregnant only protects her from being termed BECAUSE she is pregnant. It does not protect her from being termed for reasons that are unconnected with her pregnancy.
 

rmet4nzkx

Senior Member
"Notice B" Family Care and Medical Leave (CFRA Leave) and Pregnancy Discrimination and Harassment in Employment are Prohibited by Law (Poster),
http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/Publications/postersEmp.asp

Pregnancy Medical Leave & Accommodations
Discrimination based on pregnancy is illegal under both the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and the Federal Title VII laws
This includes discrimination based on pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.

Even discrimination based on the "potential" for pregnancy is illegal. For example, in one case a manufacturing company would not allow women to work certain jobs because if they were pregnant there could be harm to their fetus. This was illegal discrimination.
Accommodating Pregnancy
Employers have a number of responsibilities to employees who become pregnant. For instance, if a woman becomes pregnant, and with the advice of her doctor asks for a position that is less strenuous or hazardous, the employer must transfer her to another position if it has one, or can make one without being "unduly burdened." Basically, if its not too much trouble for the employer to accommodate the woman's needs, he has to do it.
Pregnancy Family Medical Leave
Federal Title VII Law does not explicitly require employers to grant Pregnancy leave, although it does prohibit Pregnancy discrimination. However, the Federal Law does require employers to grant medical leaves, which are applicable to pregnant women (See separate section on family and medial leave.)

The California FEHA specifically gives pregnant employees the right to take a leave of absence for a reasonable period of time, not to exceed four months. The employer does not have to pay his employee during this time.

A "reasonable period of time" is the time period where the woman is "disabled" because of her pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. "Disabled" in this context simply means she cannot work. During a Pregnancy leave, a woman may also use any vacation time she has accrued.

Employers can require any employee who plans to take a pregnancy leave to give the employer reasonable notice of the date the leave will start and how long it is expected to last.

Employers generally cannot force a pregnant employee to go on pregnancy family medical leave. It is there if the woman wants it. However, if the employer can show that the woman absolutely cannot do her job, or is "disabled" by the pregnancy, he may be allowed to make her take a leave of absence. This is, however, a very difficult situation for the employer, because it is likely that the Pregnancy can somehow be accommodated, which means the woman should be allowed to stay.
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top