axisdenied
Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Idaho
Hello FreeAdvice Legal Forum! I am looking for the opinion of a legal professional, preferably one who understands the general stigma associated with gainful employment pending the review of a criminal history (technically, an arrest record), in the state of Idaho by state agencies (candidates for Idaho gov't positions). Here we go -
Five years back, during college, I was charged with misdemeanor possession of marijuana. The charge was dismissed after withheld judgment under I.C. 19-2604. At the time I was informed by my legal professional that this constituted something of an expunction. However, I've realized in the past few days that an official shred of the record occurs only under a different code, I.C. 67-3004 (and, really, who actually knows how much such a pursuit cleans the record considering every agency who is informed of the original?) Anyway, the charge had nil to do with my employment at the time -the incident occurred after a friend was pulled over at night, the cop smelt pot on my driver, and we were both charged after a discovery of a small amount of marijuana in the car (I realize this is probably more than you need to know).
So, here is the short form of the circumstance -withheld judgment, dismissed after six months with satisfactory completion of unsupervised probation, no consequences for my federal aid and since I have earned a master's degree in my discipline. I applied for a state job that I am very qualified to do which does NOT involve direct contact with vulnerable individuals or the handling of money. Oh yeah, I have been gainfully employed ever since -kept the job I held at the time without consequence. I am also doing some filler work for a new outfit post-graduation.
Altogether I have no break in employment, no further legal problems, a verifiable record of achievement, decent references and no recent drug use. The only raise for concern here is the fact that the application explicitly asked if I'd ever had a withheld judgment and, since my record is not technically expunged, I had to disclose it. So, does my honesty win here? I mean, let's say that hypothetically speaking I am the most qualified (experience/education-wise) for the position. EEOC says I can't be denied employment under such a circumstance if it has nothing to do with my job responsibilities. Regardless, what do you think? I'd like to know!
Thank you,
a
Hello FreeAdvice Legal Forum! I am looking for the opinion of a legal professional, preferably one who understands the general stigma associated with gainful employment pending the review of a criminal history (technically, an arrest record), in the state of Idaho by state agencies (candidates for Idaho gov't positions). Here we go -
Five years back, during college, I was charged with misdemeanor possession of marijuana. The charge was dismissed after withheld judgment under I.C. 19-2604. At the time I was informed by my legal professional that this constituted something of an expunction. However, I've realized in the past few days that an official shred of the record occurs only under a different code, I.C. 67-3004 (and, really, who actually knows how much such a pursuit cleans the record considering every agency who is informed of the original?) Anyway, the charge had nil to do with my employment at the time -the incident occurred after a friend was pulled over at night, the cop smelt pot on my driver, and we were both charged after a discovery of a small amount of marijuana in the car (I realize this is probably more than you need to know).
So, here is the short form of the circumstance -withheld judgment, dismissed after six months with satisfactory completion of unsupervised probation, no consequences for my federal aid and since I have earned a master's degree in my discipline. I applied for a state job that I am very qualified to do which does NOT involve direct contact with vulnerable individuals or the handling of money. Oh yeah, I have been gainfully employed ever since -kept the job I held at the time without consequence. I am also doing some filler work for a new outfit post-graduation.
Altogether I have no break in employment, no further legal problems, a verifiable record of achievement, decent references and no recent drug use. The only raise for concern here is the fact that the application explicitly asked if I'd ever had a withheld judgment and, since my record is not technically expunged, I had to disclose it. So, does my honesty win here? I mean, let's say that hypothetically speaking I am the most qualified (experience/education-wise) for the position. EEOC says I can't be denied employment under such a circumstance if it has nothing to do with my job responsibilities. Regardless, what do you think? I'd like to know!
Thank you,
a