V
vicki coles
Guest
My company is offering, in 2001, health benifits to same sex domestic partners, but
not to heterosexual domestic partners.
This, in essense gives the federal tax benifits to same sex partners as it gives to single persons, while at the same time giving
them all the company health benefits of a married couple. I feel this is discriminitory. My partner and I do not marry for a number of reasons, none of which are
my employer's business. For them to give benefits to a group of employee's (as
determined bt sexual preference) and not to me is blatent discrimination. I live in the
state of Washington, my company's headquarters are in Minnesota, howeverm they are incorporated in Delaware.
I appreciate any assistance.
not to heterosexual domestic partners.
This, in essense gives the federal tax benifits to same sex partners as it gives to single persons, while at the same time giving
them all the company health benefits of a married couple. I feel this is discriminitory. My partner and I do not marry for a number of reasons, none of which are
my employer's business. For them to give benefits to a group of employee's (as
determined bt sexual preference) and not to me is blatent discrimination. I live in the
state of Washington, my company's headquarters are in Minnesota, howeverm they are incorporated in Delaware.
I appreciate any assistance.