J
Jim Wilde
Guest
Ohio. Hi. It seems that corporations are beginning to use outsourced personality tests as part of their hiring practices. In these tests (the Chally Assessment test, in this instance), many questions probe a person's beliefs about their world, and their responses to situations. During the course of the test, there are questions that are...questionable...as part of a hiring process. such questions probe your view of the political arena, your family values, etc.)
Another area werequestions asking if the person is frequently fatigued.
Point Blank...is this legal? Or is it simply a question of corporate bit-between-the-teeth until their called on it. For instance, unless I'm mistaken, it would be illegal for an interviewer to ask a question of an interviewee that probes for their political beliefs, or their like or dislike for the current political arena. This test, among other things, does just that.
A good friend just lost a job prospect because she "failed" a portion of this test, a portion that covers an aspect of her profession that she actually excells in.
Is this legal?
Second, since this test was the given as the reason that she was rejected as a candidate, does she not have the right to:
a) see the scientific validation for the test (I'm a social scientist, and know very well that its easy to create a personality test; very difficult to make one that stands the rigors of validity...I'd like to see the test's validation proofs)
b) have a copy of her own test and answers.
Thanks.
Another area werequestions asking if the person is frequently fatigued.
Point Blank...is this legal? Or is it simply a question of corporate bit-between-the-teeth until their called on it. For instance, unless I'm mistaken, it would be illegal for an interviewer to ask a question of an interviewee that probes for their political beliefs, or their like or dislike for the current political arena. This test, among other things, does just that.
A good friend just lost a job prospect because she "failed" a portion of this test, a portion that covers an aspect of her profession that she actually excells in.
Is this legal?
Second, since this test was the given as the reason that she was rejected as a candidate, does she not have the right to:
a) see the scientific validation for the test (I'm a social scientist, and know very well that its easy to create a personality test; very difficult to make one that stands the rigors of validity...I'd like to see the test's validation proofs)
b) have a copy of her own test and answers.
Thanks.