+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Faciabella Guest

    Dangerous dogs and homeowners insurance

    What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Massachusetts

    I live in a Massachusetts suburb which does not have a dangerous dog ordinance on the books, and we have had some problems in my ward with aggressive dogs. In one case, a pit bull mix, unprovoked, leapt a fence and mauled an elderly Golden Retriever in front of six screaming children playing in their own back yard. The dog lunged at a five year old and the mother who tried to defend the family pet. It took three adults, one using dog deterent spray and another striking the enraged animal with a shovel, to fend off the dog. The Golden Retriever survived, and the police and animal control department attempted a mediation, but the owner of the Pit-bull mix will not agree to secure his yard with an escape proof fence.

    In a second case, a pit bull in another neighborhood has terrorized neighbors for several years. It has bitten two people,(neither bite was serious enough to warrant medical attention) one on her own front porch, killed an neighbors cat, attempted to bite a two year old, had a delivery man face down in the street curled in a fetal position while circling and growling, etc. The city has issued citations demanding the family muzzle the dog and keep it in an escape proof enclosure, but the family will not comply.

    My question is this...both these dog owners are well aware of their dogs aggressive tendencies, they are documented in police reports. If the inevitable happens, and someone is injured or mauled, does the homeowners insurance company have to honor the claim? I realize that some insurance companies have breed bans, it is not certain if the insurance companies which cover these individuals know they own pit bulls/ pit bull mixes. Even if the insurance companies providing coverage to these individuals do not ban these breeds, does Massachusetts insurance law require them to cover a claim if there is proof that the owners knew the dogs were dangerous, but refused to take steps to protect the public? I am thinking of the analogy involving "risk" which states that, if you are operating a dynamite factory in your basement, your insurance provider won't cover you if your house blows up, because you took unneccesary risks. We are hoping that the knowledge that their insurance company will not cover a claim against a dog bite will compel these individuals to secure their dogs properly.
  2. #2
    Souix is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,687
    Quote Originally Posted by Faciabella
    What is the name of your state?What is the name of your state? Massachusetts

    I live in a Massachusetts suburb which does not have a dangerous dog ordinance on the books, and we have had some problems in my ward with aggressive dogs. In one case, a pit bull mix, unprovoked, leapt a fence and mauled an elderly Golden Retriever in front of six screaming children playing in their own back yard. The dog lunged at a five year old and the mother who tried to defend the family pet. It took three adults, one using dog deterent spray and another striking the enraged animal with a shovel, to fend off the dog. The Golden Retriever survived, and the police and animal control department attempted a mediation, but the owner of the Pit-bull mix will not agree to secure his yard with an escape proof fence.

    In a second case, a pit bull in another neighborhood has terrorized neighbors for several years. It has bitten two people,(neither bite was serious enough to warrant medical attention) one on her own front porch, killed an neighbors cat, attempted to bite a two year old, had a delivery man face down in the street curled in a fetal position while circling and growling, etc. The city has issued citations demanding the family muzzle the dog and keep it in an escape proof enclosure, but the family will not comply.

    My question is this...both these dog owners are well aware of their dogs aggressive tendencies, they are documented in police reports. If the inevitable happens, and someone is injured or mauled, does the homeowners insurance company have to honor the claim? I realize that some insurance companies have breed bans, it is not certain if the insurance companies which cover these individuals know they own pit bulls/ pit bull mixes. Even if the insurance companies providing coverage to these individuals do not ban these breeds, does Massachusetts insurance law require them to cover a claim if there is proof that the owners knew the dogs were dangerous, but refused to take steps to protect the public? I am thinking of the analogy involving "risk" which states that, if you are operating a dynamite factory in your basement, your insurance provider won't cover you if your house blows up, because you took unneccesary risks. We are hoping that the knowledge that their insurance company will not cover a claim against a dog bite will compel these individuals to secure their dogs properly.

    ***You would have to find out who their insurance company is and what their policy is. Also, do you know for a fact that these people have homeowners insurance? If they own their home free and clear and there is no loan against it, they don't have to have any insurance at all, if they don't want it.***
  3. #3
    JETX is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Somnambulist University
    Posts
    40,807
    "If the inevitable happens, and someone is injured or mauled, does the homeowners insurance company have to honor the claim?"
    *** Simple answer, no. As you have noted, some insurance companies ban coverage for specific breeds. If the owners insurance has that exclusion, then their insurance clearly would not pay.

    "does Massachusetts insurance law require them to cover a claim if there is proof that the owners knew the dogs were dangerous, but refused to take steps to protect the public?"
    *** No.

    As for Massachusetts laws regarding dogs, there are LOTS of laws that would apply. Go to: [url]http://www.massfeddogs.org/laws/dlindex.htm[/url]
    Last edited by JETX; 06-07-2004 at 05:12 PM.
  4. #4
    Faciabella Guest
    In response to Souix, the owner of the pit bull mix actually admitted to his neighbor previously that he had trouble getting homeowners insurance and had to shop around because of his dogs' breed. We are not sure about the other family.
  5. #5
    Faciabella Guest
    In response to Jetx, thank you for the link. One of the problems we are having right now with the city is enforcement; we have not determined why the police and animal control have been unable to persuade, (perhaps through fines) the owners of the dog that has already bitten two people, and reeked general havoc in that neighborhood for years, to keep the dog confined to its owners property.

Similar Threads

  1. Dangerous Dogs
    By notyourmomma in forum Neighbors & Boundaries
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-25-2011, 07:18 PM
  2. Neighbor says our dogs are dangerous
    By SchnauzerOwner in forum Libel / Slander / Defamation
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-17-2010, 02:01 PM
  3. Homeowners and service dogs
    By jumpstartrn in forum Condos and Co-Ops
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-24-2008, 11:24 AM
  4. Dangerous Dogs
    By Jenini in forum Landlord / Tenant Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-04-2006, 04:23 PM
  5. dogs and homeowners
    By jahuber in forum Life Insurance & Annuities
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-18-2003, 06:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 1995-2012 Advice Company, All Rights Reserved

FreeAdvice® has been providing millions of consumers with outstanding advice, free, since 1995. While not a substitute for personal advice from a licensed professional, it is available AS IS, subject to our Disclaimer and Terms & Conditions Of Use.