K
KYSassy
Guest
What is the name of your state? Kentucky
As many of you know, I am involved in an EEOC charge. That is still in progress. Now I am having another problem.
I have been fighting for unemployment benefits since 3/4/03. The latest hearing was for the subject of separation. I am in the process of an appeal of the determination. I was sent home by a senior manager and told not to return to work until he called me.
Now, the owner is trying to say that I just quit. One of the reasons he considers this scenario is that it took me 10 days to
get the additional information related to my permanent limitations.
I supplied it to the company on the day that my doctor signed it. The request was treated as he treats most letters he receives. He did it when he found the time, which happened to be 9 days later.
My question is this:
If my employer wanted a more timely delivery, shouldn't he have paid for me to go for an office visit to secure the information?
My condition is not under current medical care. My insurance co. would not cover an office visit because this issue relates to a workers' comp claim from 1999-2000. So, since I couldn't afford another non covered office visit, I dropped off a written request for a more detailed statement of my limitations.
The unemployment office has determined that I took too long in getting the requested information to my employer. I am in the process of appealing this finding.
As many of you know, I am involved in an EEOC charge. That is still in progress. Now I am having another problem.
I have been fighting for unemployment benefits since 3/4/03. The latest hearing was for the subject of separation. I am in the process of an appeal of the determination. I was sent home by a senior manager and told not to return to work until he called me.
Now, the owner is trying to say that I just quit. One of the reasons he considers this scenario is that it took me 10 days to
get the additional information related to my permanent limitations.
I supplied it to the company on the day that my doctor signed it. The request was treated as he treats most letters he receives. He did it when he found the time, which happened to be 9 days later.
My question is this:
If my employer wanted a more timely delivery, shouldn't he have paid for me to go for an office visit to secure the information?
My condition is not under current medical care. My insurance co. would not cover an office visit because this issue relates to a workers' comp claim from 1999-2000. So, since I couldn't afford another non covered office visit, I dropped off a written request for a more detailed statement of my limitations.
The unemployment office has determined that I took too long in getting the requested information to my employer. I am in the process of appealing this finding.