A
ald
Guest
What is the name of your state? Virginia
I was employed by an FMLA covered employer from January 2001 to April 2002, (approx. 15 months) then laid off due to loss of the govt contract I was assigned to. I was rehired by the same employer in November of 2002, when they acquired a new govt contract that could utilize my skills.
At the time of my re-employment, I had just discovered that I was pregnant, due on July 16 of 2003. At orientation on July 18, I spoke privately with HR and they indicated that I would not be eligible for family leave because I would not technically have been with the company for 12 months prior to the birth of my child.
From what I have researched, the 12 months need not have been consecutive, my total months employed at this company will be approx. 22 months. By my calculations, I will have been employed for 36 consecutive weeks (Nov.18 ,2002- Jul. 16, 2003) which, when multiplied by 40 hours per week comes to 1440 hours of consecutive work prior to my need for leave (the required amount is 1250.)
The company's stated policy is that employees who are rehired after 3 months do not retain benefits. Can they legally refuse to provide Family Medical Leave?
I was employed by an FMLA covered employer from January 2001 to April 2002, (approx. 15 months) then laid off due to loss of the govt contract I was assigned to. I was rehired by the same employer in November of 2002, when they acquired a new govt contract that could utilize my skills.
At the time of my re-employment, I had just discovered that I was pregnant, due on July 16 of 2003. At orientation on July 18, I spoke privately with HR and they indicated that I would not be eligible for family leave because I would not technically have been with the company for 12 months prior to the birth of my child.
From what I have researched, the 12 months need not have been consecutive, my total months employed at this company will be approx. 22 months. By my calculations, I will have been employed for 36 consecutive weeks (Nov.18 ,2002- Jul. 16, 2003) which, when multiplied by 40 hours per week comes to 1440 hours of consecutive work prior to my need for leave (the required amount is 1250.)
The company's stated policy is that employees who are rehired after 3 months do not retain benefits. Can they legally refuse to provide Family Medical Leave?