Prudence (aka Happyroach), you and Votan are absolute idiots. You are NOT basing your answers on the FACTS.... or the law!
FACT: The writer signed a contract stating, "Washers, dryers, dishwashers, waterbeds and garbage disposals are not permitted in apartments." Please note: there is NO exclusion as to whether it has to be used, covered with a sheet, in a closet, etc. It is VERY clear that the are NOT permitted in the apartment!!
FACT: There is nothing in the above statement that says anything about "if the apartment is upgraded to allow other appliances, then this clause is void"..... or anything that voids this contract.
FACT: The writer has a washer and/or dryer in the apartment.
FACT: Any 'games' by the writer (as to symantics of 'washer AND dryer', or 'washer under sheet', or 'washer in closet') has absolutely NO relevance to the PROHIBITION.
FACT: The writer/tenant is in breach!!
FACT: This breach of the contract is sufficient to evict the writer/tenant.
Now, you can play all the games you want (hide and seek, 'guess what is under the sheet', 'ghost in the closet', symantics, etc.) but the do NOT void the signed contract.
So, get your FACTS straight and quit throwing maybe's and coulda's into this thread that clearly do NOT apply.
FACT: The writer signed a contract stating, "Washers, dryers, dishwashers, waterbeds and garbage disposals are not permitted in apartments." Please note: there is NO exclusion as to whether it has to be used, covered with a sheet, in a closet, etc. It is VERY clear that the are NOT permitted in the apartment!!
FACT: There is nothing in the above statement that says anything about "if the apartment is upgraded to allow other appliances, then this clause is void"..... or anything that voids this contract.
FACT: The writer has a washer and/or dryer in the apartment.
FACT: Any 'games' by the writer (as to symantics of 'washer AND dryer', or 'washer under sheet', or 'washer in closet') has absolutely NO relevance to the PROHIBITION.
FACT: The writer/tenant is in breach!!
FACT: This breach of the contract is sufficient to evict the writer/tenant.
Now, you can play all the games you want (hide and seek, 'guess what is under the sheet', 'ghost in the closet', symantics, etc.) but the do NOT void the signed contract.
So, get your FACTS straight and quit throwing maybe's and coulda's into this thread that clearly do NOT apply.
Last edited: