DISMISSED!
i realized something early this morning ... I'm on the lease, my bf beau is listed as an occupant. The only notice they sent (the one they told me to disregard in the beginning of the month) was addressed to beau.
The judge called us. The mgr showed him the notice he is claiming was the 3day notice. I was asked if I recognized it. I said yes. The mgr showed the judge the lease, I again stated that I recognized it. The judge asked the mgr what he was seeking, the mgr gave him a $ - i objected. The mgr was asking for more than what he sued for! Cant do that ... The judge then asked me if I had a defense.
I informed him that the notice was something I was told to disregard, and that it was irrelivant bc it wasnt even addressed to me. The judge stopped and looked at it, then the lease. He then looked at the mgr like he was retarted and said "you sent the notice to one person, but ur suing another?"
the apt mgr said "well they both are living in the apartment"
The judge said "that doesnt matter-you are suing HER, not both of them. U didnt give HER sufficient notice. You gave notice to the occupant, but you are suing the person on the lease."
The mgr just looked at the floor. To support my insufficient notice theory I also mentioned (although did not go into alot of detail) that not only was I not given sufficient notice for the eviction - I was also illegally locked out without notice before or at the time of the locks being changed. The judge asked the mgr if he had a rebuttal - the mgr just looked at the floor & mumbled no.
The judge then asked me if I had anything else to add - "Yes your honor, I move for a dismissal of this case." The judge already had the samp in his hand - he was just waiting for me to say it! He stamped the papers and started writing something (not sure yet what it says - im going to get copies tomorro) but that 10-15sec. felt like FOREVER! Then he said ""The defendant has moved for a dismissal, the motion is granted & this case is hereby dismissed without predjudice" WHOO-HOO! the manager ran out of there! lol
I know hes gonna send me & notice & refile, but I have all the evidence to show it was dont in retaliation when I told him I was going to sue him for the illegal lockout. Im sending a certified "Demand that Retaliatory Action Cease" letter today. I may loose - but I won this one & if the judge sees him threatening me with an eviction if I filed my suit as retaliation ... I may have a shot. Unfortunately, the clerk told me today that it may be JAN before MY case gets heard.
Im also considering modifying MY suit and asking for more bc they filed an answer denying all accusations and demanding proof. I dont think $1000 is for all the stress - i mean ive lost $1200 in unemployment alone... Im still thinking about it...
So i may still get evicted before my suit against the apartments goes to trial...
BUT when my case DOES get heard - Im pretty confident I will win. The eviction hearing has now shown presidense & laid foundation that the apt mgr does not comply with the statutes for giving notice when taking action against his tenants. Not to mention the retaliation factor ... I think my suits in the bag. Atleast we have an extra 10 days or so. I'll keep you guys posted.
One day at a time cause thats all you get anyway!
- and the mgr might want to work on his resume b4 typing up my notice!
