I'm a renter in the Boston area. Recently, a heating pipe in the apartment burst and the floor of one of the rooms was damaged.
The current theory as to how the pipe burst was that a draft from the built in air conditioning unit created an area that was colder than the surrounding apartment, causing the pipe to freeze. I was living in the apartment at the time and I was aware that there was a draft.
The lease does not contain any stipulations regarding a minimum temperature the thermostat must be kept at, or anything regarding the air conditioner unit. There is a clause indicating that the tenant will need to pay for damage they cause to the apartment.
At one point, someone (I believe one of the plumbers who came to fix the burst pipe) suggested that I might have turned the heat off due to the ambient warmth of the apartment complex, and I offered that explanation to the LL. I'm not entirely certain if this is what actually happened, but he has latched onto it and is using it as a justification to demand that I pay the insurance deductible on getting the floor repaired*. When I suggested that we move the conversation to email, so that there would be a record of everything said, he became angry and threatened me with legal action**. I was ultimately able to convince him to meet in person to go over the insurance details and the costs involved in repairing the floor.
I am not unwilling to pay, however I don't want to be strong-armed into an unfair agreement. Is my LL in his rights to demand that I pay the deductible?
*I think. In our first conversation, he stated that the insurance company would not be fully covering the repairs of the floor and that I would be making up the difference. In a follow up conversation, he indicated that he wanted the deductible. In neither conversation has he indicated a specific amount, claiming that he did not know the amount
**At no point in that conversation did I say that I did or did not intend to pay, only that I wanted the conversation in a form that would leave a paper trail
The current theory as to how the pipe burst was that a draft from the built in air conditioning unit created an area that was colder than the surrounding apartment, causing the pipe to freeze. I was living in the apartment at the time and I was aware that there was a draft.
The lease does not contain any stipulations regarding a minimum temperature the thermostat must be kept at, or anything regarding the air conditioner unit. There is a clause indicating that the tenant will need to pay for damage they cause to the apartment.
At one point, someone (I believe one of the plumbers who came to fix the burst pipe) suggested that I might have turned the heat off due to the ambient warmth of the apartment complex, and I offered that explanation to the LL. I'm not entirely certain if this is what actually happened, but he has latched onto it and is using it as a justification to demand that I pay the insurance deductible on getting the floor repaired*. When I suggested that we move the conversation to email, so that there would be a record of everything said, he became angry and threatened me with legal action**. I was ultimately able to convince him to meet in person to go over the insurance details and the costs involved in repairing the floor.
I am not unwilling to pay, however I don't want to be strong-armed into an unfair agreement. Is my LL in his rights to demand that I pay the deductible?
*I think. In our first conversation, he stated that the insurance company would not be fully covering the repairs of the floor and that I would be making up the difference. In a follow up conversation, he indicated that he wanted the deductible. In neither conversation has he indicated a specific amount, claiming that he did not know the amount
**At no point in that conversation did I say that I did or did not intend to pay, only that I wanted the conversation in a form that would leave a paper trail