What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? ny
Our landlords are first time landlords - the wife did not want to rent out her very lovely, million dollar, home - they use it only for summers and otherwise live year long in Manhattan. They have been offensive, hostile, manipulative and a lawyer has told us to prepare for a court battle to regain our $8,000 deposit.
They had decided to keep the dish racks from the dishwasher - we are not 'kosher enough' for them. They bought used racks from ebay - we cannot use, due to the fact that we are kosher and the ebay racks were used and not kosher. We've been told that, legally, the lease did not provide that they would be taking out the racks, and the husband said he'd return them. Their real estate agent (besides claiming my real estate 'lied between her teeth', which she most certainly did not) had left a message on my cell phone (which I have) indicating she and the wife were coming to return the racks to us. The wife then said over her dead body and bought the used ones off ebay - expecting us to pay. OK. We didn't pay, they didn't give us the old racks, I'm washing by hand and not too pleased...but life is short. (Lots of chipped and broken dishes. )
They asked if they could use a room in the basement for storage. Any furniture in the house we didn't want while we were renting (we had not wanted a furnished house - after we agreed to rent, the wife told me a numbe of times, "I don't want to have to do a thing," and she meant it) we were told to place in this room. Long story short - they then locked the room. Again, not provided for in the lease. We should have access to this room. Again, life is too short.
The wife has been contentious when there hasbeen any need for repairs. In the house no more than 10 days, it was obvious that the washer and dryer were in need of repair - as well as MOST of the light switches. She offensively insisted that we must have broken anything and we would have to pay for any repairs...though she eventually relented. Rather, her husband prevailed. While the electricians were repairing a broken bathroom heater, they tripped the fuse. After an hour of searching - it was discovered that the fuse box was in the locked room. The electrician insisted that it was a violation for us not to have access to that room - he unlocked the door and told us we had a right to have access to it. Especially since there are so many electrical problems in the house and the owners live an hour away and are not easily contacted.
Here on the forum, we've been informed that landlords need not leave access, and I'm questioning if this is true in all circumstances. In addition, the light switches continue to emit occasional sparks and have shocked my sons a number of times. There is every reason to believe that we will need access to the fuse box - as the electrician originally told us. The landlords called and the electrician's boss echoed the decision mentioned here - that a landlord need not provide such access in a home.
Again, there is no provision in the lease that they should have retained possession of that room, nor keep the door locked.
There is a provision in the addendum to the lease that the landlords included -that any damage to their belongings would warrant replacement. How far can this go? If we have made a scratch on a counter? If there is a nick in a tile? If there are (usual) marks on the wall (we have a cleaning lady who helps me every Monday - she assures me that I am keeping the house very clean) Must we pay for repair, replacement, repainting of such small 'usual' and common occurences?
The wife had viciously informed me that she had not totally changed a provision on the lease that she was supposed to at the signing. She had let me know that she purposely worded the lease so that they are only responsible for landscaping for 'the 2009 season,' and she told me that this mandates that we are responsible for the 2010 season, should we remain until the spring. My agent said that her ommision for the 2010 season means nothing - save that this woman was deceitful and manipulative and had no second thought about altering a legal document.
Any advice is welcome - and much appreciated.
Any advice is welcome.
Our landlords are first time landlords - the wife did not want to rent out her very lovely, million dollar, home - they use it only for summers and otherwise live year long in Manhattan. They have been offensive, hostile, manipulative and a lawyer has told us to prepare for a court battle to regain our $8,000 deposit.
They had decided to keep the dish racks from the dishwasher - we are not 'kosher enough' for them. They bought used racks from ebay - we cannot use, due to the fact that we are kosher and the ebay racks were used and not kosher. We've been told that, legally, the lease did not provide that they would be taking out the racks, and the husband said he'd return them. Their real estate agent (besides claiming my real estate 'lied between her teeth', which she most certainly did not) had left a message on my cell phone (which I have) indicating she and the wife were coming to return the racks to us. The wife then said over her dead body and bought the used ones off ebay - expecting us to pay. OK. We didn't pay, they didn't give us the old racks, I'm washing by hand and not too pleased...but life is short. (Lots of chipped and broken dishes. )
They asked if they could use a room in the basement for storage. Any furniture in the house we didn't want while we were renting (we had not wanted a furnished house - after we agreed to rent, the wife told me a numbe of times, "I don't want to have to do a thing," and she meant it) we were told to place in this room. Long story short - they then locked the room. Again, not provided for in the lease. We should have access to this room. Again, life is too short.
The wife has been contentious when there hasbeen any need for repairs. In the house no more than 10 days, it was obvious that the washer and dryer were in need of repair - as well as MOST of the light switches. She offensively insisted that we must have broken anything and we would have to pay for any repairs...though she eventually relented. Rather, her husband prevailed. While the electricians were repairing a broken bathroom heater, they tripped the fuse. After an hour of searching - it was discovered that the fuse box was in the locked room. The electrician insisted that it was a violation for us not to have access to that room - he unlocked the door and told us we had a right to have access to it. Especially since there are so many electrical problems in the house and the owners live an hour away and are not easily contacted.
Here on the forum, we've been informed that landlords need not leave access, and I'm questioning if this is true in all circumstances. In addition, the light switches continue to emit occasional sparks and have shocked my sons a number of times. There is every reason to believe that we will need access to the fuse box - as the electrician originally told us. The landlords called and the electrician's boss echoed the decision mentioned here - that a landlord need not provide such access in a home.
Again, there is no provision in the lease that they should have retained possession of that room, nor keep the door locked.
There is a provision in the addendum to the lease that the landlords included -that any damage to their belongings would warrant replacement. How far can this go? If we have made a scratch on a counter? If there is a nick in a tile? If there are (usual) marks on the wall (we have a cleaning lady who helps me every Monday - she assures me that I am keeping the house very clean) Must we pay for repair, replacement, repainting of such small 'usual' and common occurences?
The wife had viciously informed me that she had not totally changed a provision on the lease that she was supposed to at the signing. She had let me know that she purposely worded the lease so that they are only responsible for landscaping for 'the 2009 season,' and she told me that this mandates that we are responsible for the 2010 season, should we remain until the spring. My agent said that her ommision for the 2010 season means nothing - save that this woman was deceitful and manipulative and had no second thought about altering a legal document.
Any advice is welcome - and much appreciated.
Any advice is welcome.