Wow, 'happyroach', you continue to amaze us with your ignorance.....
You said:
Q1) Did you get a written judgment?"
A1) First, have you heard of any other kind of final judgment EXCEPT 'written'???? Second, an eviction proceeding (Writ of Detainer) does not result in a JUDGMENT being rendered, but an ORDER or WRIT is.
Q2) "is there anything that says "with predjudice" or " without predjudice"?"
A2) Again, you are confused about judgments and orders. ORDERS do not have prejudice (correct spelling).
Q3) " When a landlord CHOOSES to evict, they have 2 choices: to go quick fast and dirty and get you out ASAP, by NOT asking for a money judgment, or to have a trial and ask for money."
A3) Wrong again. A Writ of Detainer (or possession) CAN include compensation for unpaid rent, fees and penalties. Also, a Writ does NOT preclude the landlord from subsequent legal action to recover unpaid rent, penalties, fees or damages.
Q4) "And most stipulations or judgments will say "with predjudice" so that Neither YOU or the Landlord can sue each other over this apartment. EVER!"
A4) Wrong again. I can show you 100's of 'real' judgments that make NO mention of prejudice. That is a claim that would be brought up by a Defendant in the redundant case (called Res Judicata).
Q5) "And also most states have some sort of a stale rent law or laches, which means a landlord must persue this in a reasonable time frame, and a year is NOT reasonable...UNLESS he was incapacitated and couldnt file sooner."
A5) Since you say MOST states provide this 'protection', please provide ANY link to, oh lets say 5 states, that prohibit further landlord action beyond a 'reasonable time frame'.
Q6) "So you would have grounds of the Landlord's "BAD FAITH" in pursuing this matter a year later."
A6) Again, this is so ludicrous a statement as to be totally laughable!!!
Quick, someone turn the lights on... I want to hear 'happyroach' go scrabbling off into the dark again!!!