Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Landlord / Tenant Issues : Includes Leases, Evictions, etc.
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > REAL ESTATE LAW > Landlord / Tenant Issues

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:30 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 458
It's a window! latch or no latch they would have gotten in. A simple crow bar would have twisted off any latch and the bad guys would have gained entry. Contact paper over a window would have allowed entry without a mess.
  #17  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13
i agree i was not aware of the right i had as a tenant. this is my first time renting a apartment and i thought i just had to keep bringing it up to him till he did something about it. oh i don't know if i stated before but he came out and fixed the window the day after the robbery. so he ignored it until this happened.
  #18  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:41 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Central VA
Posts: 4,464
Your evidence in the police report is WHAT you TOLD the police was taken.....still no proof!
__________________
CPM * 45 years of property management experience * Age and experience ALWAYS trumps youth and enthusiasm
  #19  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:46 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cvillecpm View Post
Your evidence in the police report is WHAT you TOLD the police was taken.....still no proof!
all items included serial numbers. the big screan was unhooked from the wall wit the mount just sitting there.

oh who ever made the comparison with the sidewalk and not moving out of the way ... OK yes i would have avoided it but if the driver hits me he is still held liable. because it was his responsibility to stop
  #20  
Old 11-05-2009, 05:53 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 458
I don't know, but if taken to court would not the landlord not be able to recall that you had ever mentioned the lock on the window? Then next time you need anything repaired, put it in writing.
  #21  
Old 11-05-2009, 06:05 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13
i have written records from his manager that i had requested that window be fixed.
  #22  
Old 11-05-2009, 07:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baranov View Post
I don't know, but if taken to court would not the landlord not be able to recall that you had ever mentioned the lock on the window? Then next time you need anything repaired, put it in writing.
He said that he has the records, from the LL that he had been asking for the window to be fixed the whole time. maybe you can stay with a thread by reading it.

Yea, you should have secured your own things by finding some way to lock the window. I make sure my whole place is as secure as possible, and sometimes rigg alarms to warn me someone is trying to get in, but thats because I have a paranoia complex I developed as a teenager. Still regular people take steps to secure their property, and it will be up to a judge to know if reasonable steps include, and are limited to requesting the LL fix the lock however many times... or should you have done something more.
But you will have to show that the reason you were broken into was because the window was not able to be locked. (like if a certain door doesn't lock in a common entryway for Tennant's, and a rapist used the door to get in because it was broken... )
But I do not see how a burglar know the window wasn't locked, are you saying that he tried each window to see of it was locked, and if they were, he was going to go home? you still didn't say what kind of apartment was. a house? a multi unit? a basement in a home? what?

Its not your LL's fault you were broken into, you should have been insured, is a quick and pretty safe answer, but the only way you can be sure is to try.

So ...You can try, I suggest you try, and good luck with that.
  #23  
Old 11-05-2009, 07:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13
its an apartment unit on the bottom floor. the suspect are teenage kids that live around the apartment and probably scouted out the window that wasn't locked. here is the deal the window the one that was broken is the bathroom window and right next to it is a bedroom window. i don't see an adult being able to get through the bathroom window because its very small . bedroom window much bigger right next to it locks and they didn't go through. drawing the conclusion that they probably wouldn't gotten in if it was locked. spoke to a local landlord.tenant attorney he told be i should at least try that i do have a cause to do it.
  #24  
Old 11-05-2009, 08:16 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 42
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngbliss View Post
its an apartment unit on the bottom floor. the suspect are teenage kids that live around the apartment and probably scouted out the window that wasn't locked. here is the deal the window the one that was broken is the bathroom window and right next to it is a bedroom window. i don't see an adult being able to get through the bathroom window because its very small . bedroom window much bigger right next to it locks and they didn't go through. drawing the conclusion that they probably wouldn't gotten in if it was locked. spoke to a local landlord.tenant attorney he told be i should at least try that i do have a cause to do it.
Brilliant advise from the lawyer in your area. at least try. Good luck.

And purchase some rental insurance, its really cheep, and you would have had new stuff already. (if your policy provided new stuff for old stuff.. speak to an insurance agent too)
  #25  
Old 11-05-2009, 09:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,842
You should have had renters insurance. It is NOT your landlords fault that someone broke into your apartment. And he is not responsible for your belongings - you are. You don't seriously think the LL is 51% responsible for your loss do you?
__________________
Lawsuits are not about justice. They are about MONEY. If you don't want money, then you shouldn't be thinking about suing. And people post here because they are thinking about suing. Because they want money, no matter how much they don't want to admit that to themselves.

-Auto insurance adjuster for 2 years - as of 6/15/09, I am FREE!
  #26  
Old 11-06-2009, 09:18 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 42
It wont hurt him to try, and it is the LL's responsibility to secure the property. Its not like the tenant left the window open with a sign about his stuff. Obviously the LL knows its his responsibility to keep the security devices (window locks) in good repair and actually working, or he would not have come the day after the fact, and installed a window lock.

I think he has a chance. and so does a lawyer in his community, or so says the poster.
  #27  
Old 11-06-2009, 10:14 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 13
o spoke to a few more attorneys locally and they all seem to agree that i should take the landlord to small claims do to the fact that he did not provide the locks for the window and it is the probable cause of the break in. going of that who ever it was knew that the window was not lockable.
  #28  
Old 11-06-2009, 11:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 21,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngbliss View Post
o spoke to a few more attorneys locally and they all seem to agree that i should take the landlord to small claims do to the fact that he did not provide the locks for the window and it is the probable cause of the break in. going of that who ever it was knew that the window was not lockable.
Let us know how that works for you...
__________________
*
*
The information I gave is based on my 7 seconds of research on Google. Review the information yourself to make an informed decision.

Communication is KEY - 10 mins of talking now can save you months of headaches later!

Masterfully stating the obvious to the oblivious! (Thanks SP!)

Tell it like it is! When all else fails, make up a statistic!

Gender references shall apply equally to the other gender. I will not correct gender mistakes (unless I want to)
  #29  
Old 11-06-2009, 12:54 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 404
Good luck with your case.

I just have to comment on your logic with the analogy of the car and the sidewalk.

Yes...the DRIVER would be liable for the damages....just as the THIEF is liable for the loss of your belongings. It's a BIG LEAP from the thief to the LL. But it may be worth a try.

Yes he should have fixed the lock but YOU should have had a piece of wood ( a book, whatever) to secure it until it was done.Just leaving the window as it was was negligence on your part as well, and certainly contributed to the break-in and subsequent losses!
  #30  
Old 11-06-2009, 01:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Central VA
Posts: 4,464
YoungB * so you feel comfortable advising the judge about your BIG ASS SCREEN tv that you did not VALUE enough to cover with RENTER'S INSURANCE * "Bailif, Next case!"
__________________
CPM * 45 years of property management experience * Age and experience ALWAYS trumps youth and enthusiasm
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.