![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Client ConfidentialityWashington My lawyer was told by the other parties lawyer that his clent had gotten information from my bank and stated what private information they had gotten. When I went to the bank and showed them the letter of admission the bank contacted the lawyer. Other parties lawyer said it was clent confidentiality and he wouldn't say anymore. Bank says nothing they can do if the lawyer won't discuss it. Why would this be covered by client confidentiality once the lawyer admitted in writing that his client had gotten the information from my bank? Thanks for any answers anyone might have!! Last edited by BluJay; 01-13-2006 at 04:11 PM. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
A: The lawyer can disclose that the info was gotten by his client from the bank, but any further discussion could be stopped by the lawyer's assertion of his client's confidentiality.
__________________ There are two rules for success: (1) Never tell everything you know. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| A: The lawyer can disclose that the info was gotten by his client from the bank, but any further discussion could be stopped by the lawyer's assertion of his client's confidentiality.[/quote] Q: Thanks for the answer. Do you think the bank had any responsibility to have kept my password protected account secure? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Q: Thanks for the answer. Do you think the bank had any responsibility to have kept my password protected account secure? A: Yes.
__________________ There are two rules for success: (1) Never tell everything you know. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Last edited by BluJay; 01-14-2006 at 10:04 PM. |
![]() |