
Originally Posted by
bethgop While my case was being appealed, one of the defendants filed Chap 7.
My atty and I found out after I won the appeal and before the lower court reversed its original ruling. Should my lawyer have filed to reopen the BK case?
Nope. A chapter 7 liquidation is simply that... a liquidation of the petitioners exempt assets. As long as the petitioner is able to show the trustee that his/her debts exceed the reasonable potential for assets, the court will generally grant the discharge. Your additional debt would simply have increased their debt load.
Aside from filing a Writ of Execution, my atty did not do anything else to collect the judgment against the other defendant who did not file BK.
That is a separate issue and not related to the bankruptcy debtor.
I have been informed by another atty that my atty (any atty for that matter) should have known to go to the BK court and filed a motion to reopen the case?
The other attorney was either confused.... or you were.
He now claims that after all he is not a BK expert.
DOH!!!
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) filed in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.7M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!