+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    bethgop is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2

    Conflicting Information

    What is the name of your state? CALIFORNIA
    While my case was being appealed, one of the defendants filed Chap 7.
    My atty and I found out after I won the appeal and before the lower court reversed its original ruling. Should my lawyer have filed to reopen the BK case?
    Aside from filing a Writ of Execution, my atty did not do anything else to collect the judgment against the other defendant who did not file BK. I have been informed by another atty that my atty (any atty for that matter) should have known to go to the BK court and filed a motion to reopen the case? He now claims that after all he is not a BK expert.
  2. #2
    JETX is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Somnambulist University
    Posts
    40,809
    Quote Originally Posted by bethgop
    While my case was being appealed, one of the defendants filed Chap 7.
    My atty and I found out after I won the appeal and before the lower court reversed its original ruling. Should my lawyer have filed to reopen the BK case?
    Nope. A chapter 7 liquidation is simply that... a liquidation of the petitioners exempt assets. As long as the petitioner is able to show the trustee that his/her debts exceed the reasonable potential for assets, the court will generally grant the discharge. Your additional debt would simply have increased their debt load.

    Aside from filing a Writ of Execution, my atty did not do anything else to collect the judgment against the other defendant who did not file BK.
    That is a separate issue and not related to the bankruptcy debtor.

    I have been informed by another atty that my atty (any atty for that matter) should have known to go to the BK court and filed a motion to reopen the case?
    The other attorney was either confused.... or you were.

    He now claims that after all he is not a BK expert.
    DOH!!!
    There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) filed in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

    Why has he spent over $1.7M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Conflicting information
    By wiseguy in forum Drunk Driving / DUI / DWI
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-07-2011, 12:41 PM
  2. Conflicting information
    By angiesmom in forum Child Support
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-12-2009, 07:57 AM
  3. Getting conflicting information...GA Law
    By turnkey803 in forum Consumer Bankruptcy
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-13-2007, 01:22 PM
  4. Conflicting information on SOL in OH
    By brokeinohio in forum Debt Collections
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-30-2005, 09:25 AM
  5. Conflicting Information
    By brookelea in forum Consumer Bankruptcy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-25-2002, 03:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

© 1995-2012 Advice Company, All Rights Reserved

FreeAdvice® has been providing millions of consumers with outstanding advice, free, since 1995. While not a substitute for personal advice from a licensed professional, it is available AS IS, subject to our Disclaimer and Terms & Conditions Of Use.