![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
Counsel's Bad Direction?What is the name of your state? Georgia Can an HOA lawyer who is advising a neighborhood board to discriminate against one neighbor for an offense that four other neighbors and an ACC and board member are currently violating be disciplined in Superior Court?
__________________ If at first you don't see or understand my question, PLEASE GO GO AWAY |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I would think so. It sounds to me like the board members in violation have a definite self-interest, which creates liability. Proper counsel should advise against that. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Even when you phrase it like that, NO. It is not a breach of ethics, nor is it malpractice to advise a client to treat differing members of an association differently. Only if the discrimination is for a prohibited reason would there be a claim of malpractice. Then, only the party in privity would be able to report the attorney. (Well, anyone can report. Only a person in privity will have the report dealt with.)
__________________ When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. --W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne) |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Well, the prohibited reason is that the laws of the 'hood state that selective enforcement or discrimination of any kind is not allowed.
__________________ If at first you don't see or understand my question, PLEASE GO GO AWAY |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| The malpractice-resulting prohibited reasons considered "discriminatory" are related to the equal protection clauses/theories of the federal or state constitutions. It is not related to statutory or HOA rules.
__________________ When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. --W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne) |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| No, no, I wasn't referring to the ERPA. The verbiage is in the actual covenants of the neighborhood.
__________________ If at first you don't see or understand my question, PLEASE GO GO AWAY |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I know. In those situations, even if it were malpractice, only the person in privity could make a compliant to the Bar which would result in an investigation.
__________________ When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. --W. T. Pooh (aka A. A. Milne) |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| As suggested by Tranquility, ethics issues result in a complaint to the Bar and an investigation, not a proceeding in court. The neighbor who is complaining of the disparate treatment can't request an ethics investigation against the association's attorney, or bring an action in court against the attorney. The neighbor's claim is against the HOA for its allegedly selective enforcement of the HOA rules. |
![]() |