fact or false

[FlyingRon]

You keep missing the obvious statement. You have to show up for the court dates unless you have gotten an answer dismissing or postponing them. You don't show up, you're likely going to lose. Unlike a criminal proceeding, there's no requirement that you be there to be ruled against.

The trial assistant is just that, an assistant to the court. They are there for an orderly flow and NOT to educate you about how to deal with your motions or what to expect from the court. Lawyers are expected to already know this.

You better get cracking, you've got 30 days from when the judgment was entered to file your appeal (although you can file a motion to extend that :-)

[PCNerd]

You missed the question,you do not have to be present at Motions when evidence if irrefutable according to AR Rules. THE QUESTION is, a “Motion hearing was scheduled, WHAT IS THE STATUS BY THE COURT OF THE MOTIONS, dismissed, denied, etc. WHAT DID THE COURT DO WITH MOTIONS? I am fully aware of Job Desc for Trial Asst, THEY are the gate keeper to Judge. In fact I filed post Judgment Motion for finding of facts. We are aware of dates, but NONE have YET explained how NO RULING on Scheduled Motions was made of ANY KIND, NOTHING. One was sent “expedited and requested trial date” be moved beyond the same day the scheduled Motions date as it is impossible to got to trial until the Motions on forcing Discovery were heard. They are playing cover up for dirty law firm the has openly admitted they worked for X and as such “Cannot represent you”. What was overlooked by the JUDGE and Lawyers and in Motion after Motion was that firm WAS my divorce lawyer and the basis of their case is work done by theft firm, to include some that resulted in theft, creation of false accounts etc. Tell me a firm can LEGALLY do Divorce and without permission at same time work for other side? Add that to your fables as this is exactly what Court and other side is covering. No he said she said, hard data and email and public document prove it. Again CAN Court NOT do a thing with Motions, I mean ZERO, even when they schedule them. Does COURT have to read the Motions, as if they did they would then be required by Rules to turn in dirty law firm as “know or should know” via hard evidence. These folks are simply running a cover up, and now we find setting up false accounts in my name, transfer of funds etc is Fed Money laundry. Sorry for some that seem to engage in Lawyer cover up but this is what is going on! HOW CAN COURT ignore all Motions, and AGAIN NOT publish ANY Status, if Court “heard them as scheduled, even if Denied, seems they must have to say something. This bunch simply does NOT say a thing. Amusingly ALL were responded to by other side, but not ONE factual denial.. AR Courts reputation is notorious for such stuff. . Could it be if the judge doesn’t read the motions its see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil? Being Pro Se is recognized a poor and uneducated?
I’m fighting for what is right/factual, what are they fighting for? Why is it about politics? If we have to accept our accountability, why can’t they fess up? I have been naive, I admit. I trusted in my law firm to represent me in court. I didn’t realize law firms can say one thing and do another legally. Where are the lawyers with a conscious that want to clean up the legal system. You guys write the laws, aren’t we entitled to be represented by a trusted lawyer without all the lies. Just because we have little knowledge of the law doesn't mean we are stupid. Paying $500 an hour, plus should entitle us to the best council, yet it didn't. Lawyers don't like it when there fellow workers screw up, yet they stand in the shadows without doing anything about it. Fines for a lawyers screw up is minimal to what will happen in this law suit. Seems its all bureaucratic, nobody does anything. Maybe that is what is wrong with our nation. No one wants to take on the dirty politics.

[Ronin]

THE QUESTION is, a “Motion hearing was scheduled...

Did you attend the scheduled hearing on the motion?

you do not have to be present at Motions when evidence if irrefutable according to AR Rules

Please specify which rule you refer to.

[PCNerd]

THE QUESTION IS; WHAT IS THE DUTY OF THE COURT TO REPLY concerning the STATUS, PROCESS or dispose of MOTIONS. DOES THE COURT HAVE TO AT LEAST READ MOTIONS?
DO NOT EVEN CARE IF THEY DISMISS, DENY, APPROVE, RULE UPON ETC. THEY SIMPLY WILL NOT SAY WHAT HAPPENED TO ANY OF MOTIONS

Seems they MUST at least reply publish status, etc OF WHAT THEY DID. NO ONE WE SPOKE WITH EVER HEARD of “COURT ALLOWS MOTIONS TO JUST VANISH”. THAT IS THE TWO CORE QUESTION. ALL ELSE IS A DIVERSION FROM IT. WHAT IS RESPONSIBILITY OF AR COURT TO A MOTIONS, DO THEY HAVE TO AT LEAST READ BY RULES?
You sound like you are dodging the question on another subject. Go look up Rule, that is NOT the question If you knew subject matter you could reply, SO FAR NONE HAVE, THE QUESTION again IS WHAT IS THE DUTY OF THE COURT TO REPLY, STATUS, PROCESS or otherwise dispose of MOTIONS to both parties. This is same Court where months after Motions filed and responded, said “We have not looked at any yet”.. and do not hide with “no response 30 days etc considered denied etc.. as after 5 months they then “Scheduled hearing on some” so the “30 day etc” is not violable or hearing dates is not.. The data in Motions and evidence proves corrupt lawyers and the serious conflicts of interest, some leading to criminal actions. Seems Court is playing game of “If I never read them then I do not have to act upon as Cannons require, and same for other lawyer as is up to neck in some very serious theft and cover ups. “Good ole boys protection society etc” is not exactly an unknown in AR courts and their discipline board is even worse. If you have overwhelming evidence, yet its not recognized, why bother to write motions? Why bother with 100% evidence that proves my case when in fact no one cares? Wasn't rocket science to look at the evidence, it speaks for itself. So the theory would be?