Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > COURTS, LAWYERS & LITIGATION > Legal Ethics & Lawyer Malpractice

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2006, 06:43 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3

Failure to inform of right to a speedy trial


What is the name of your state? New York
Is it legal malpractice for an attorney to waive my right to a speedy trial without first consulting me or at the very least letting me know that he has done this?
  #2  
Old 10-16-2006, 07:14 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,426
Unless the defense atty is ready to go to trial, ASAP, s/he will always waive speedy trial.

It would be malpractice for an atty to rush to trial, unprepared. For you, that could be disastrous; for the atty, extremely embarrassing and possibly a reason for your anger.

Most attys will waive speedy trial, 45 days at a time. If the defendant was out of custody, the People have 45 days from the arraignment & plea, to bring the case to trial; if the D is in custody, then it's 30 days to trial.

Most defense attys, at the arraignment and plea, haven't even received the discovery (the complaint [charging document] & D's rap sheet & any proof/evidence booked) until that day. They are usually, in court, trying to read the charges, get an offer from the Prosecutor, plead their client not guilty, & waive time to the next appearance.

In many jurisdictions, if the defense atty doesn't waive time, the Prosecutor will not make an offer (plea bargain) on the case (because if subpoenas have to go out and witnesses are called into court, why make it easy on the D ? As long as subs go out, may as well do a quick trial.)

So, no, your atty can't advise you of every right, immediately.
If time was waived, it was done on a 45 day period, only.
If there was a repetitive waiver of speedy trial for a lengthy period which you never agreed to, then it may be malpractice. But waiving trial is a common practice of def attys who are always hoping witnesses die, retire or get transferred.
So, it may prove to be wise tactics in some cases.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 PM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.