Federal District Court - Perjury and/or Contempt

[kmckenn]

Apologies if this is redundant, I am looking for the right FORUM for this matter.

What is the name of your state? Ohio: (This is a FEDERAL COURT proceeding)

This case involves "sexual harassment" but most significantly retaliation and wrongful termination for complaining to the defendant of the harassment. The defendant has answered my complaint.

Small Calendar:

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thr Fri Sat
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 1 2
3 4 5
------------------------------------------
Plaintiff's allegations:

* September 24, 2004 - (Plaintiff) met with (HR Manager) in regards to (Harasser). (Harasser) hostiliy confronts (Plaintiff) for meeting with (HR Manager). (Plaintiff) informs (HR Manager) of confrontation. On this date (Other Person) recieves (disturbing) letter at residence from (Harasser).

* September 27, 2004 - (Other Person) instructs (Plaintiff) to read letter. (Plaintiff) insists (Other Person) to turn it in to management. (Plaintiff) informs (HR Manager) of letter, and action need be taken.

* Sept 28 or 29, 2004 - (Other Person) finally turns in letter to (Supervisor).

* October 1, 2004 - (Harasser) is terminated for being a threat.

------------------------------------------

"4 (Defendant) admits that on or about September 24, 2004, (HR Manager) met with Plaintiff regarding (Harasser) and a letter (Harasser) sent to (Other Person). On this same date, (Defendant) suspended (Harasser) pending further investigation."

"5 (Defendant) admits that on or about September 28, 2004, (Other Person) provided it a copy of a letter sent to (Other Person) by (Harasser)."

"6 (Defendant) admits it terminated (Harasser) as alleged in Plaintiff's complaint.

------------------------------------------

FACTS - As a first hand witness, the first day the Harasser was not in the workplace was Monday, Oct 4, 2004. The defendant "admits" they terminated Harasser on Friday October 1, 2004. If the Harasser was indeed terminated as ALLEGED, and ADMITTED on October 1, 2004, there was NEVER any "suspension" at all. The Defendant is contending that it took immediate and effective action 4 days prior to knowledge for what the action was based on. The assertion of the alleged, ficticious suspension is a VOLUNTARY addition into that admission. No where was "suspension" in the Plaintiff's allegations, that day or any other day.

I can ALMOST overlook the "... and a letter..." because it could be a harmless act of humanity by an attorney thrown into this case... BUT, the last sentence in regardds to the SUSPENSION... by the fact it was a VOLUNTARY assertion and ADMISSION, and NOT a harmless oversight of poorly prepared Attorney, I would like to make issue of this to the court as a blatant/wanton mis-representation, and representative of the defendant.

Could someone please point this poor Pro-Se litigant in the right direction to properly SPANK the defendant and/or their councel for TANGIBLE in accuracy, by their own admission(s)?!?!?!?

[seniorjudge]

duplicate post

asked and answered

[url]http://forum.freeadvice.com/search.php?searchid=875686[/url]