• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

mis-representation question

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

Harley138

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? MA

Several years ago i applied for disability.I was of course immediately denied as almost all applicants are as s.o.p.At that point i did what i thought was the smart thing and retained legal representation in the form of a well known national disability lawyer/advocate. To make a horrible long story short i waited out the process and appeals and finally after 3 years got my hearing before a judge.
After all the standard procedures and swearing in the judges first real question to me was what had transpired to cause my current situation. I was floored.I told the judge that i had been informed repeatedly and with great emphasis that any and all information that was certainly relevant to my case in my own opinion was absolutely NOT relevant as said info pre-dated my date of application for benefits.
The judge was less than pleased and my "lawyer" who id only got to meet less than an hour before the hearing for the very first time in 3 years recoiled in horror saying"it wasn't me your Honor" which in fact it wasn't, but it WAS the people she worked for.The judge made it clear the information was most certainly relevant and he wanted to hear everything i had to say about it. My lawyer didn't speak so much as another word the entire hearing.
Before i could even finish testifying on my own behalf the judge awarded me full benefits ,full back benefits,excluded me from re-applying in future and promised to personally fill out my paperwork and file it himself to speed up the process.My lawyer later told me hes never done that in the 125 cases shes "handled" with him.
The judge apologized to me personally and no less than 5 times on behalf of others and asked to personally shake my hand. Once because i had to be present unnecessarily,twice on behalf of the govt for failing me,once on behalf of the state for failing me, [B]and once for the gross mis-information of my own counsel.[/B]
Needless to say the info my own counsel "suppressed" would have certainly helped my case as it would have consisted of testimony by physical therapists,doctors,and spinal specialists.

The bottom line is this: i feel like my lawyer may have taken advantage of me to increase his payday by prolonging my case and my misery by feeding me false information. I almost feel as though i should seek recourse against my own lawyer.I feel as though the 25% they are going to get was for the work i did testifying for myself, they ultimately did nothing to earn their fee other than lie to me.
Am i right , am i wrong, should i just be happy its over and let it go and let them take advantage of me and forget about it? need some advice please.
 


Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
Bottom line: The lawyer got you the exact result you wanted.

If you want to file a complaint, contact the MA BAR
 

Harley138

Junior Member
spoken like a true lawyer. The actual lawyer who"represented" me was just a pawn,i do not feel she did anything wrong. I guess my question should be this: If the legal counsel you hire to represent you lies to you are you still obligated to pay them for their misconduct?
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
spoken like a true lawyer. The actual lawyer who"represented" me was just a pawn,i do not feel she did anything wrong. I guess my question should be this: If the legal counsel you hire to represent you lies to you are you still obligated to pay them for their misconduct?
What misconduct?
You hired the law firm/attorney to get you a favorable outcome in your appeal. You got a favorable outcome in your appeal. They are due their money.
 

Harley138

Junior Member
I'm referring to all the information my lawyer insisted was irrelevant as it pre-dated my date of application for benefits, which the judge said was completely untrue.That information could have resolved my case a long time ago and saved me and my family a lot of grief and hardship.The contract i signed was for them to represent me not lie to me to prolong the case.
Its not that i'm trying to weasel out of something i agreed to. I got my benefits and its over.

it seems your trying to tell me its perfectly ethical and legal for a lawyer to lie to his client as long as the client gets desired outcome, if thats the case then my questions have been answered and ill move on. It just seems to me like i was taken advantage of, but i have been all throughout the process so its not surprising.

thank you for your input
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top