 | 
12-29-2005, 02:54 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2
| | Too much information What is the name of your state? Indiana! My wife was contacted by an attorney looking for my son who had not returned a call. His x-wife is wanting to have her name removed from the title of a vehicle. The attorney asked if she wanted to know information about why he was calling. My wife did say yes. He then proceeded to tell her that my son was delinquent on car payments.
This upset my wife and after thinking a moment about it, I thought that this cannot be legal for an attorney to give out this kind of information. He had no idea about our relationship with our son and even if he did, this just can't be right. We have nothing to do with the issue between our son and x-wife and quite frankly it is none of our business.
The attorney told me that he was speaking for his client and that their was nothing illegal about it. Although, he apoligized many times. With all the privacy acts and laws that we have today, I just can't think that he was right in doing what he did.
Thanks | 
12-29-2005, 04:02 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,545
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by deebripp I just can't think that he was right in doing what he did. | Depends. If the attorney was acting as a THIRD party debt collector, then what he did was wrong... and the violated person (your son) MAY have legal options. However, if he was simply acting as your ex-wifes attorney in trying to remove his name from the vehicle, nothing wrong.
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! | 
01-03-2006, 09:46 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2
| | | Too much information Thanks for your response. Just so I am clear, it was legal and ethical for the attorney to tell my wife that my son was delinquent on a car payment. It seems if this is legal, an attorney could call anyone and tell them someone else is behind on payments.
He is acting on behalf of my sons x-wife in trying to get her name off the title. | 
01-03-2006, 09:58 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Over the Rainbow
Posts: 8,721
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by deebripp Thanks for your response. Just so I am clear, it was legal and ethical for the attorney to tell my wife that my son was delinquent on a car payment. It seems if this is legal, an attorney could call anyone and tell them someone else is behind on payments.
He is acting on behalf of my sons x-wife in trying to get her name off the title. | then he has done nothing wrong, your son has no expectation or agreement regarding confidentiality with his ex wife's attorney. | 
01-03-2006, 09:58 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,545
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by deebripp Thanks for your response. Just so I am clear, it was legal and ethical for the attorney to tell my wife that my son was delinquent on a car payment. It seems if this is legal, an attorney could call anyone and tell them someone else is behind on payments.
He is acting on behalf of my sons x-wife in trying to get her name off the title. | Based solely on the information in your post, I see nothing illegal OR unethical in your sons x-wifes attorney telling your wife that. He is NOT acting as a third party debt collector and would not be prohibited from contacting you with that information.
__________________ There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).
Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport! | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Rate This Thread | Linear Mode | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.