Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > CONSUMER & GENERAL PRACTICE LAW > Lemon Law

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-05-2006, 06:39 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9

Old Car and the 'AS IS' condition


What is the name of your state? California
I bought a used 'unclaimed' car from a towing company who had previously impounded the vehicle. While I realize the car is old, my expressed concerns when I bought the vehicle is that it passes the smog test so I can get it certified during the ownership transfer.

The seller assured me that the only thing wrong with the car, aside from being 'old', is that it only needs a minor calibration of the air/fuel mix ratio. At worst, a tune-up.

Upon brining it to a mechanic, I was advised that the car was so badly in need of major repairs that it can't even come close to getting it (smog) tested. Both the mechanic and the Department of Motor Vehicle told me that in California, the seller bears the responsiblity of getting the smog certificate upon sale of the vehicle. They advice I bring it back to the seller to get it done, or try to get my money back.

Seller would have none of it and tells me he isn't giving me my money back since I signed an "AS-IS" document, but he instructed me to bring the vehicle back and he will try to fix the problem so I can get it smogged.

I brought the vehcile back to him last July 3rd, he still have not done anything with it up to today, and he's been very belligerent everytime I called to inquire.

What are my rights/options?
  #2  
Old 09-05-2006, 07:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,546
The following is from the CA Consumer Affairs website:

Q: Who is responsible for obtaining a Smog Check when a vehicle is sold?
A: Section 24007 (b)(2) of the Vehicle Code states it is the responsibility of the seller to provide a valid smog certificate at the time of delivery of the vehicle. There is no provision in the law to sell a vehicle "as is."

Q: I just purchased a vehicle and the seller did not provide a Smog Check. The vehicle needs expensive repairs in order to pass. What should I do?
A: Go back to the seller, inform them about Vehicle Code section 24007 (b)(2), and try to work things out amicably. If that fails, you have the option to pay for the repairs and the Smog Check yourself, and then take the seller to Small Claims Court to recover your costs. Although the law clearly supports the buyer, collecting on a small claims judgment can be difficult, so the amicable solution is usually best. If the seller is a state-licensed auto dealer, buyers have the additional option of filing a complaint with the DMV, which regulates new- and used-car dealers.

[url]http://www.smogcheck.ca.gov/stdpage.asp?Body=/GenInfo/OtherInfo/Frequently_Asked_Questions_Part_1.htm[/url]

The fact that this is very likely a salvage vehicle may affect the accuracy of this answer.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #3  
Old 09-05-2006, 08:48 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9
JetX-

Thank you so much for the information...I am reading up on the VHC 24007 soon after I send this reply in.

Regards-
  #4  
Old 11-30-2006, 07:08 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9

For general information


Hello-

I'm not sure if this will be helpful, but I am contributing to this thread again as a capper to this particular case. I eventually filed a lawsuit in small claims to get this matter resolve and have received a court decision.

My lawsuit was based on representation to swindle by the person that sold me my vehicle. Upon agreement back in July 3, 2006; the seller asked me to bring back the vehicle so that he can fix it to allow me to get the smog inspected and certified. He had the vehcile for almost two months but never did fix it. He moved without letting me know until the last two days asking me to get the vehicle since they are vacating the place. By the time, end of August, I had already filed for the suit.

My basis of argument is VC 24007 - 2(b).

The presiding judge was actually a temporary judge, thus the decision didn't come until a few day later in a mail.

The judge decided that the buyer is NOT liable for anything and thus do not owe me any monies I was suing for. Which are the payment, the insurance coverage premium, the registration fee.

The basis of the judge's decision was something about that he termed OPG (?), whereby certain entities are allowed by the government to sell a vehicle without having to get the proper smog certification during the sale. The seller in my case was a Towing Company, and the vehicle he sold to me was actually a previously towed, abandoned, and unclaimed vehicle.

I still feel strongly about my case since the seller misrepresented the sale by saying I won't have problems getting it smog certified, which I did. He also perjured his way through his arguments.

Lesson learned. I spent more time and money trying to make this right, but it blew up in my face. What I got out of ths whole thing is - EDUCATION, in more ways than one. Sometimes, even if you dotted your 'i's and crossed your 't's doesn't always work out for you.

When purchasing used vehicle, PLEASE - ask for the smog certificate first. If none is available during the sale, make sure you sign an agreement that the sale is predicated on the vehicle passing smog inspection without further cost to you. If it doesn't, that you have the right to get your money back.

Thanks for the previous information given earlier nonetheless.

Cheers.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.