Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > INSURANCE > Life Insurance & Annuities

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2009, 10:49 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2

Life Insurance Question


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Iowa

My father died in 1995. My mother received one of his employer offered life insurance plans. She died in 1996. 13 years later another employer offered life insurance policy is discovered. Dad had an administrator. Mom had an executor and a will. Mom is also listed as beneficiary on dad's employer card (however, employer no longer has that on file). Executor/admistrator does. Insurance company wants employer to back it up. There are 8 children. Life insurance company made payouts to 6 and did not contact executor/administrator (one of the other children) or mom's one and only beneficiary of her will (one of the other children). We think the policy needs to be paid through her estate- 2 reasons (she survived our father and she is listed as beneficiary). Therefore, it should go through her will and to that beneficiary. Insurance company says too bad, already paid out, blah, blah. Policy is only for $3,000. What do u think? We also have the paperwork for the first employer offered life insurance policy that signifies my mom as beneficiary and it has a employer signature on it (validation). However, insurance company says that one is from Aetna and has no bearing on the one from MetLife (I think they do)--- both are employer offered and both are listed on employee enrollment card. Thank You.
  #2  
Old 06-18-2009, 02:19 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: pennsylvania
Posts: 459
Send a message via Yahoo to momm2500
have you read the life insurance policy? as far as who gets the money depends on the wording in the actual policy. how did the insurance company know to send checks to at least 6 of the children? They had to know something or have something that indicates how to contact at least 6 of the 8 children. it does not really matter that she did survive your father, this was not discovered till well after your mother passed. this would cause more problems if it was paid to the estate since the estate should be closed after 1996 death. so it would cost more money to re-open the estate to deposit the money and then distribute to the beneficiaries and the $3,000 would end up being somewhere around $1,000 after legal fees and paperwork.
  #3  
Old 06-18-2009, 03:13 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by momm2500 View Post
have you read the life insurance policy? as far as who gets the money depends on the wording in the actual policy. how did the insurance company know to send checks to at least 6 of the children? They had to know something or have something that indicates how to contact at least 6 of the 8 children. it does not really matter that she did survive your father, this was not discovered till well after your mother passed. this would cause more problems if it was paid to the estate since the estate should be closed after 1996 death. so it would cost more money to re-open the estate to deposit the money and then distribute to the beneficiaries and the $3,000 would end up being somewhere around $1,000 after legal fees and paperwork.

No, I have not seen the policy, but again we have our mother written as beneficiary on the enrollment card and she had a will. The executor/administrator contacted employer immediately after death and they brought to our attention the first policy. Are they at fault for not alerting our mother of the second? I still believe that her survivorship should matter. I read on another forum according to Iowa Beneficiary laws that it needs to be processed through her estate? She survived him. Isn't that correct?
  #4  
Old 06-18-2009, 04:47 PM
cbg cbg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 23,702
Not necessarily. Not if he had contingent beneficiaries named.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.