He transferred it from my savings to Merrill edge, I authorized 10,000, he took 25,500, I reported it to police a year later, also to fraud dept of Merrill edge, he put a car in my name as collateral, which I got when I left, but now he has stolen that, it is titled in my name only and was never in his name ever, I reported it as stolen as well
I will pass on the issue of the vehicle for now, but as to the savings account:
In a civil action for restitution of the $15,000 your proving his misappropriation of the money may not be as difficult as some suspect.
Assuming that the account was in your sole name his only defense would be that you either loaned him the $15,000 or that it was a gift.
If he were to claim it was a loan, which is doubtful, then he would be obligated to repay it and without proof of repayment you would be entitled to a money judgment.
More likely he would defend on the notion that the money was a gift. However, it he does so it would cast a whole different light on whom has the burden of proof in the lawsuit.
Because in order to sustain a gift the alleged donee has the burden of proving the alleged donor’s intention to make the gift by clear and convincing evidence. And his word over yours alone would not suffice to sustain that burden.
True, he may be judgment proof. But if the judgment reflects that it is based on larceny/fraud, etc., he couldn’t rinse it in a future bankruptcy.
Also, what do you think the likelihood is that if he is sued for the money that he would go to the trouble and expense of even showing up in court?
You should review all of t is with your attorney, including adding a count for the value of the stolen vehicle.
Also, none of this business of reporting the thefts to the authorities will be heard in civil court. It is all self serving and thus inadmissible.
However, if he were to defend and testify that you didn't report any theft as evidence that the money was gifted, then evidence of making the report would be admissible in rebuttal of his testimony. But only then.