Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > FAMILY LAW > Marriage, Domestic Partnerships and Other Family Law Matters

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:11 PM
iy25i
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Family law on 19 year old girl


What is the name of your state? NY
What are the laws for parents that have a 19 year old that will not follow rules in there home or respect them in any way. She moved out once on us and moved back with the same behavior. Comes home at night after we're asleep. Sleeps all day, showers, does everything she needs to do and leaves again before we get home from work. Lost her job, has bills. What are our rights? Please help.
  #2  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,191

Re: Family law on 19 year old girl


Quote:
Originally posted by iy25i
What is the name of your state? NY
What are the laws for parents that have a 19 year old that will not follow rules in there home or respect them in any way. She moved out once on us and moved back with the same behavior. Comes home at night after we're asleep. Sleeps all day, showers, does everything she needs to do and leaves again before we get home from work. Lost her job, has bills. What are our rights? Please help.

My response:

"Rights" about what?

She was "out" once, and you voluntarily took her back in - - knowing what your daughter was like. What good would it be discussing this with you, when all you're going to do is let her back in the house again!

Good luck.

IAAL
  #3  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,145
And change the locks so she has to grovel if she wants to use the house!
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #4  
Old 02-07-2004, 12:11 AM
carmonal03
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ask her to leave or to abide by your rules.

Only about a year or two ag I was in the same situation but it was on the other side. It was ME that had returned home, and ME that started disrespecting my parents home in the same manor that your daughter is doing. I know now that what I did and how I acted was wrong, direspectful, and unacceptable.
I am 21 now and am a parent and i look at things a little differently. I am now living 3000 miles away from my parents, and I miss them very much, and every time I write a letter to my mom back home in CA I apologise for giving her such a hard time. I now have a pregnant 19 year old sister that is doing the same to my parents. And I have tried talking to her about it and telling her, that she is wrong in doing this but her nly response is that I am a hypocrite because I did those things too. My sister although is only 19 and pregnant, has an associates degree in business, and is an insurance agent making almost $30 an hour. She can certainly afford her own apartment, but my parents cannot bring themselves to kick her out. My point is that, my parents never kicked me out as much as they complained about what I was doing to them, I finally got a job and back on my feet and moved out. It was only that I became a parent myself and now see my sister doing what I did that I know it was wrong. My advice is set some ground rules with your "kid" and say obey them or get out.
They may thank you for this later.
good luck
leo

Last edited by carmonal03; 02-07-2004 at 12:15 AM.
  #5  
Old 02-07-2004, 09:35 AM
iy25i
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am all for kicking her out if she doesn't abide by my rules however I want to know from anyone if they can tell me if we are responsible for her actions until she is 21 because we live in New York State? That means bills vandalism, anything.
  #6  
Old 02-07-2004, 09:45 AM
Ramoth
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
At 18 she became an adult in the eyes of the law, so you are not responsible for her actions. Kick her out.
  #7  
Old 02-07-2004, 11:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,672
Deleted due to incorrect info.

Last edited by stealth2; 02-07-2004 at 09:00 PM.
  #8  
Old 02-07-2004, 11:48 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,509
"NY's age of majority is 21, so the legalities may be different."
*** WRONG!!!

The NY General Obligations Law (§3-112) defines a "minor" or "infant" to be "a person who has not attained the age of eighteen years."
Source: [url]http://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?cl=49&a=6[/url]

In this case, the parents would NOT be liable for the described conduct of the 'adult'.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #9  
Old 02-07-2004, 11:49 AM
hexeliebe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
There is always the "Brazilian" option
  #10  
Old 02-07-2004, 11:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Catatonic State
Posts: 75,781
Yes, I liked that bossa nova option.
  #11  
Old 02-07-2004, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,145
NY merely has one pay CS for them until they are 21. Intact families, I believe, are allowed to stop supporting them at 18.

OR should you book those tickets to Brazil?
__________________
Adoptive parents ARE "real" parents. Sharing genes is not what makes you a "parent"!
  #12  
Old 02-07-2004, 05:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,509
Yep, just as I suspected. Someone is reading the age for 'child support' to stop (21 in NY) and confusing that with the age for criminal liability (18 in NY).
They are NOT the same.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
  #13  
Old 02-07-2004, 05:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 38,191
[quote]Originally posted by hexeliebe


There is always the "Brazilian" option

=====================================

My response:

. . . which, of course, is the "Good Housekeeping" preferred method of dealing with thankless children - - of ANY age.

IAAL
  #14  
Old 02-07-2004, 06:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 29,672
Quote:
Originally posted by JETX
Yep, just as I suspected. Someone is reading the age for 'child support' to stop (21 in NY) and confusing that with the age for criminal liability (18 in NY).
They are NOT the same.
Hence the "may" in there.
  #15  
Old 02-07-2004, 07:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somnambulist University
Posts: 39,509
Quote:
Originally posted by stealth2
Hence the "may" in there.
Nice attempt at 'spin', but it simply does NOT work when looked at entirely.

Ramoth said, "At 18 she became an adult in the eyes of the law, so you are not responsible for her actions. Kick her out.

And in response, YOU said:
"NY's age of majority is 21, so the legalities may be different. I'd talk to a local attorney to find out what you need to do to have her legally emancipated and evicted from your home."

Simply, your post was NOT correct and clearly was confusing the issue of child support obligation and criminal liability ages.
__________________
There are at least 17 lawsuits (!!) pending in various courts, including the US Supreme Court, asking if Obama is a natural born citizen (as req'd by Art II, Sec 1 of the US Constitution).

Why has he spent over $1.35M in legal fees to block disclosure... rather than spend $12 for a VALID birth cert to settle the matter? The 'certificate' he has presented doesn't qualify to get a drivers license, wouldn't allow a child to qualify for Little League, or for a real citizen to get a US passport!
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.