![]() |
| ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| | |||||||||||||
| |||||||
| | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
what is the law?My question is regarding the rights of a parent diagnosed with a mental illness. My ex husband filed a change of custody petition in Sept. 2000 (in AL). The judge appointed a GAL to my daughters. This GAL interviewed them for a total of 30 minutes in January of 2001. In February, based on statements made by my ex husband she contacted DHR to have me investigated for child abuse neglect. DHR determined that there was no problem. The GAL filed a petition in Junvinille court to name my youngest daughter a dependent of the state. She charged me with child abuse neglect. DHR investigated further and reported to the court that this case should be dismissed as the allegations were unwarrented and discriminatory. My daughter's teacher and school councelor were prepared to testify on my daughter's behalf and stated that there weren't any problems. I was diagnosed with major depressive disorder recurrent and had been hospitalized 4 times in 18 months. Each hospitilalzation consisted of 3 to 7 days. Each time I made sure that my daughter was taken care of. During my interview with the GAL, she stated "it would be better for you to check yourself into the hospital before they come after you. Don't let yourself get so far down that they have to take you to the hospital" In January, I did so. I was admitted for medication adjustment. Before going in, I made certain that my daughter was taken care of. This GAL did not like my ex husband because of his temper, inability to hold a job, and his living with his parents who are both ill. The case came up in May. The case was continued until September. DHR came and interview my daughter for 2 hours and still determined that she was not dependent and that she was neither abused nor neglected. My psychiatrist also submitted to the court the statistic of women diagnosed with major depressive disorder and stated that because a person is diagnosed and suffers from major depressive disorder it DOES NOT make them unable to care for or parent their children. What recourse is there for a discrimination suit against the GAL and the judge in this case in Alabama? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Unfortunately for your situation, GALs and judges are pretty much judgment proof. As you probably know: In about 50 percent of the custody cases, someone is VERY, VERY unhappy with the results. The side who loses almost always thinks that the judge is horribly biased, insane or an idiot. Sometimes it's true. Usually it's not. The court generally tries to do what's best for the child -- at least from what it can glean from what has been placed before the court. It's not an exact science, but most of the time the right thing happens. I know this situation is very tough on you. I cannot even imagine the pain you're in right now, but if you focus on getting yourself well, rather than on how "wrong" the legal system was, you and your child will both benefit in the long run. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
re: what is the lawdorenephilpot As I stated in my initial post "DHR came and interview my daughter for 2 hours and still determined that she was not dependent and that she was neither abused nor neglected. My psychiatrist also submitted to the court the statistic of women diagnosed with major depressive disorder and stated that because a person is diagnosed and suffers from major depressive disorder it DOES NOT make them unable to care for or parent their children. " The GAL in this case interviewed my daughters for a combined total of approximately 30 minutes. She did not take heed to anything that was presented to the court, nor did the referee either. My daughter's teacher and school councelor was also there for the hearing. They had told the GAL and DHR that my dauaghter was doing fine. So tell me the court looks out for the best interest of the child. GAL's in this county receive no training except where the law is concerned. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Grace, for wht it is worth I am hopping mad at what is hapening to you. Has anyone ever bothered to look into why you suffer form mental illness? It sounds as though you may have been battered. I have been ther and feel for you. May I suggest you look on your computer to find the address for the Judiciary Ethics Committee in your state if you feel there was wrongdoing on part of the judge. Also, call your locfal newpaper ( th4e biggest one around) and ask for their help., Make it clear they cannot print anythgin without your consent., they often have incredible resources. Grace, DO NOT GIVE UP. Do you have a lawyer? Are you able to represent yourself in court? Do you have neighbors and family and friendw who will go to court with you? Where are the girsl now? Can you move4 in with someone? That may help the court in making a favorable decision for you. I owudl keep petioning the court. Do they think you woudl just be sitting around laughing and having a party afater all the stress they have put you through. Has the judge himself spoken with the girls. If not, tell him you want him to talk to them - in camera. That means whatever the girls say will be kept confidential. HOw old are the girls? Are they willng to go to court with you? DON'T GIVE UP. HANG IN THERE! |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for the support! I have contacted the local ADAP office and they are going to check into what options I have. I still have custody of my daughters. The whole thing should be over by March. The case will be dismissed in March. I get so angry that this sort of thing happens that I want to do all I can to see to it that it doesn't happen to another parent. I realize that in some cases this sort of action is neccessary. However, you cannot lump ALL mentally ill parents together. You must look at each individual case and the GAL should have investigated adequately. She just went on her own predgudices and that is discriminatory. I am not going to give up on this issue. Our children need us. Cindy |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Here is what was in the complaint filed by the GAL in juvenille court, followed by report of DHR. IN THE MATTER OF: * IN THE JUVENILE COURT FOR MYRA FLORENCE CENSORED, * CENSORED COUNTY ALABAMA A Minor Child. * CASE NO. CENSORED COMPLAINT Child: Myra Florence CENSORED Phone: CENSORED 327 18th Street DOB: 4/13/94 CENSORED, AL CENSORED Race: W Sex: F SSN: School Name: CENSORED Lather: James Malcolm CENSORED Custodian: Cynthia CENSORED 8646 County Line Road 327 18th Street CENSORED, CENSORED CENSORED, AL CENSORED Mother: Cynthia Lee Barrett 327 18th Street Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 Alleged violation/incident : Dependent/Abuse/Neglect Date of violation/incident: I agree to sign a formal petition and testify in court ~~f necessary to substantiate the complaint. - t~ Complainant: Cheryl CENSORED signature: Facts of violation/incident : Petitioner respectfully requests custody of the child be determined in that: 1) her and her sister's custody are the subject of controversy, to wit: there is currently a petition and cross petition to modify custody pending before the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County. Petitioner requests an immediate hearing as provided in 12-15- 1 (10) (c) of the Code of Alabama; 2) she is in such condition or surroundings or is under such improper or insufficient guardianship or control as to endanger the morals, health, or general welfare of the child, to wit: the child is sad, withdrawn, anxious, frequently has stomach aches and sore throats, is dirty, has not had a bath, clothes are not clean, has disheveled hair. Petitioner requests an immediate hearing as provided in 12-15-1 (10) (f) of the Code of Alabama; 3) the child's parents are unable to discharge their responsibilities to and for the child, to wit: the child's mother is diagnosed with major depressive disorder-recurrent, she suffers from ,anxiety and hopelessness and is overwhelmed. She is an alcoholic, has had suicidal thoughts as well as attempts at suicide, she has had four psychiatric hospitalizations at CENSORED over the past year. The child's father lives with his elderly parents who are in poor health, their home is not a good environment for a small child, he is not financially able to support the child, he washes cars for a living, he is not stable, is irresponsible, manipulative, angry and has a bad temper. He also allows the child to watch inappropriate fighting movies which cause the child to have nightmares and anxiety. Petitioner requests an immediate hearing as provided in 12-15-1 (10) (k) of the Code of Alabama. Date: 1-27-2001 Time: 12:10 p.m. Action taken: Petition CENSORED COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES CENSORED 3716 12TH AVENUE, EAST DIRECTOR CENSORED CENSORED Report to the CENSOED County Juvenile Court 05-03-2001 RE: Myra CENSORED DOB: 04-13-94 CENSORED Case Summary:Petition was filed by appointed GAL: Cheryl Stahl who was assigned the case per Circuit Court appointment in the Circuit Court filing of petition / cross petition custody modification matter. The petitioner contacted our agency 01-31-2001 requesting that our agency assess the family's situation as she was considering filing a dependent petition on the child. Our intake consulted with intake supervisor and conducted a preliminary check with the child's school counselor, furs. Sivley. See the intake worker's accounting of such preliminary check attached. After consulting with the school counselor and again with the intake supervisor, it was decided further assessment would not be necessary as the mother was meeting the child's needs. No safety concerns were found thus not warranting our agency's intrusion into this family's life. This position was shared with petitioner who stated she still had her doubts. Petitioner chose to file a petition regardless. After further assessing the situation in view of receiving this petition, our agency feels even stronger that there are no safety concerns warranting further intrusion into this mother's private life. She is receiving appropriate mental health services, is under her Dr.'s care, has her child in therapy, has completed parenting classes, is gainfully employed and is in close contact with her child's school. This writer's contact with the child's school counselor determined child to come to school clean with clothes that fit, and that were clean and appropriate. The counselor expressed NO concerns warranting DHR concerns or need for intervention. The mother has had some recurring episodes warranting hospitalizations, but has always put into effect a plan of care and supervision for her child if necessary. The mother cannot help what is her resulting diagnosis and takes appropriate action when necessary to get through any problem areas that come up. The school counselor and the child's teacher feels so strongly in favor of the mother's position that they volunteered to come to the hearing and be available to the court to answer any questions. The mother has secured a summer program for the child through the same church where the mother is employed. The mother and child moved recently to another home located across from where the mother works. That address is 327 18th Street CENSORED. The school counselor stated the child has been very happy about and excited Faith this move. CENSORED County DHR continues to feel that the mother is meeting the full needs of this child and has demonstrated the ability to respond to her own self drive to do the things necessary for herself and child despite her diagnosis. The mother's mental health issues should not be a discriminating factor just because they exist. She is operating and functioning extremely well as a mother, meeting her responsibilities to her child regardless. CENSORED County DHR feels dismissal of the dependency petition is warranted as having been filed unnecessarily so. See attachments. Approved: Respectfully Submitted: CENSORED CENSORED Service Supervisor I Senior Service Social Worker Tuscaloosa County DHR "AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER" |
![]() |