• FreeAdvice has a new Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, effective May 25, 2018.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our Terms of Service and use of cookies.

Charged for equipment that I was forced to take...

Accident - Bankruptcy - Criminal Law / DUI - Business - Consumer - Employment - Family - Immigration - Real Estate - Tax - Traffic - Wills   Please click a topic or scroll down for more.

klaudone

Junior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Rhode Island

My story starts here: I went to an Urgent Care to get my hand checked out because it felt as though I had broke a finger. Turns out I had a boxers fracture on my pinky finger and the was a clean break. I paid my deductible at the Urgent Care, however at the time they did not have an X-Ray tech working to get an x-ray of my hand. At that point a velcro brace of some sort was put on my hand, even though I expressed the pain that was caused by it, and I was told to go to the neighboring hospital to get an actual x-ray. I was told to make sure I wore it until I got there and to keep it on unless they told me otherwise. The x-rays were taken and a few days later I received a call back from the Urgent Care confirming that my hand was broken. At that point they told me I had to go see a specialist and have him take a look at it. So again I paid another deductible and went to see another doctor. He looked at the x-rays, touched my hand, and said I just have to be careful with it for the next few weeks and it would heal on its own. When I asked him about the brace that the Urgent Care gave me he said I could wear it but it wouldn't do anything in my situation except cause more discomfort and pain. Fast forward 3 months and out of the blue I receive a bill from the Urgent Care for $138.00. I called to find out what it was about and they said it was for the brace. Now, when I had the thing put on my hand I told them I didn't want it because it hurt and there was no point to have it if it wasn't helping. They told me I needed to have it until my situation was figured out. This to me seems extremely unfair, not only because I wasn't told ahead of time that I would be charged for it, but also because I firmly told them I didn't want it yet was still forced to take it. How is this legal? I understand that the denomination is small enough to the point where hiring a lawyer would end up costing me more in the long run, but what options do I have. I told the Urgent Care that the situation was very out of line and that I didn't want to pay the bill and they could have their equipment back, but they said I had to and if I didn't I would be sent to collections. Any advice on the situation or legality would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.:confused::confused::confused:
 


W

Willlyjo

Guest
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Rhode Island

My story starts here: I went to an Urgent Care to get my hand checked out because it felt as though I had broke a finger. Turns out I had a boxers fracture on my pinky finger and the was a clean break. I paid my deductible at the Urgent Care, however at the time they did not have an X-Ray tech working to get an x-ray of my hand. At that point a velcro brace of some sort was put on my hand, even though I expressed the pain that was caused by it, and I was told to go to the neighboring hospital to get an actual x-ray. I was told to make sure I wore it until I got there and to keep it on unless they told me otherwise. The x-rays were taken and a few days later I received a call back from the Urgent Care confirming that my hand was broken. At that point they told me I had to go see a specialist and have him take a look at it. So again I paid another deductible and went to see another doctor. He looked at the x-rays, touched my hand, and said I just have to be careful with it for the next few weeks and it would heal on its own. When I asked him about the brace that the Urgent Care gave me he said I could wear it but it wouldn't do anything in my situation except cause more discomfort and pain. Fast forward 3 months and out of the blue I receive a bill from the Urgent Care for $138.00. I called to find out what it was about and they said it was for the brace. Now, when I had the thing put on my hand I told them I didn't want it because it hurt and there was no point to have it if it wasn't helping. They told me I needed to have it until my situation was figured out. This to me seems extremely unfair, not only because I wasn't told ahead of time that I would be charged for it, but also because I firmly told them I didn't want it yet was still forced to take it. How is this legal? I understand that the denomination is small enough to the point where hiring a lawyer would end up costing me more in the long run, but what options do I have. I told the Urgent Care that the situation was very out of line and that I didn't want to pay the bill and they could have their equipment back, but they said I had to and if I didn't I would be sent to collections. Any advice on the situation or legality would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.:confused::confused::confused:
File a claim and dispute the bill in small claims court!
 

ecmst12

Senior Member
You received and used the item. You were not FORCED to take it, you could have refused. You chose not to. Now you owe the money for it.
 

Antigone*

Senior Member
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? Rhode Island

My story starts here: I went to an Urgent Care to get my hand checked out because it felt as though I had broke a finger. Turns out I had a boxers fracture on my pinky finger and the was a clean break. I paid my deductible at the Urgent Care, however at the time they did not have an X-Ray tech working to get an x-ray of my hand. At that point a velcro brace of some sort was put on my hand, even though I expressed the pain that was caused by it, and I was told to go to the neighboring hospital to get an actual x-ray. I was told to make sure I wore it until I got there and to keep it on unless they told me otherwise. The x-rays were taken and a few days later I received a call back from the Urgent Care confirming that my hand was broken. At that point they told me I had to go see a specialist and have him take a look at it. So again I paid another deductible and went to see another doctor. He looked at the x-rays, touched my hand, and said I just have to be careful with it for the next few weeks and it would heal on its own. When I asked him about the brace that the Urgent Care gave me he said I could wear it but it wouldn't do anything in my situation except cause more discomfort and pain. Fast forward 3 months and out of the blue I receive a bill from the Urgent Care for $138.00. I called to find out what it was about and they said it was for the brace. Now, when I had the thing put on my hand I told them I didn't want it because it hurt and there was no point to have it if it wasn't helping. They told me I needed to have it until my situation was figured out. This to me seems extremely unfair, not only because I wasn't told ahead of time that I would be charged for it, but also because I firmly told them I didn't want it yet was still forced to take it. How is this legal? I understand that the denomination is small enough to the point where hiring a lawyer would end up costing me more in the long run, but what options do I have. I told the Urgent Care that the situation was very out of line and that I didn't want to pay the bill and they could have their equipment back, but they said I had to and if I didn't I would be sent to collections. Any advice on the situation or legality would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you.:confused::confused::confused:
The correct advice is this: Pay your bill, as you properly owe it.

You were in no way "forced" to do anything. The words "no thank you" would have sufficed.
 
W

Willlyjo

Guest
Another post from the non-sensical world of willy. :rolleyes:
Nonsensical eh? What can be more nonsensical than paying 138.00 for a hand brace? I'd be very interested to hear what a judge would say concerning a bill for such an amount for a hand brace. I guess that isn't glaring to you huh, Zigner? :rolleyes:
 

Antigone*

Senior Member
Nonsensical eh? What can be more nonsensical than paying 138.00 for a hand brace? I'd be very interested to hear what a judge would say concerning a bill for such an amount for a hand brace. I guess that isn't glaring to you huh, Zigner? :rolleyes:
The only glaring fact we see is that you are wrong - AGAIN.:cool:
 

CSO286

Senior Member
Nonsensical eh? What can be more nonsensical than paying 138.00 for a hand brace? I'd be very interested to hear what a judge would say concerning a bill for such an amount for a hand brace. I guess that isn't glaring to you huh, Zigner? :rolleyes:
After my carpal tunnel surgery, my braces were $98.00 each. I can see $138 easy.
 

OHRoadwarrior

Senior Member
On the other side of the coin, had they given you the brace, charged you $475, and another doctor had said the preventive and cautionary measure saved your hand, you would be bragging about what a great job they did. Unfortunately, medicine is not always exact, that is why it is called a practice. Each place you seek service does not always have the equipment you need, when they do not, their obligation is to be proactively cautionary and send you to another place better equipped for your emergency.

Consider this, if you had arrived with a heart attack, needing immediate surgery and they not life-flighted you elsewhere, for $30,000, instead had sent you by ambulance for $1000, would your relatives be grateful that even though you were dead, your estate saved an additional $29k claim?
 
W

Willlyjo

Guest
After my carpal tunnel surgery, my braces were $98.00 each. I can see $138 easy.
I seriously don't believe a judge would agree that 138.00 for one hand brace is reasonable. If I had to pay 138 for such brace, I'd rather spend another 30-40.00 to see what a judge would say in a small claims proceeding. :)
 

ecmst12

Senior Member
Yeah there was no way to know that the brace was not necessary until after the x-ray was done, so it was an appropriate precaution to keep you from possibly injuring yourself worse.
 
W

Willlyjo

Guest
The only glaring fact we see is that you are wrong - AGAIN.:cool:
Wrong about what? Advising the OP to file a claim due to the unreasonable outrageous expense of a hand brace in the amount of 138.00? Seriously Antigone it seems evident your priorities are in disarray. ;)
 

Antigone*

Senior Member
Wrong about what? Advising the OP to file a claim due to the unreasonable outrageous expense of a hand brace in the amount of 138.00? Seriously Antigone it seems evident your priorities are in disarray. ;)
It is not a judge's position to say how much the vendor can charge for the brace. We live in the US and unless we are talking about charging obscene interest rates, a judge is not going to care what the cost of the brace is. The judge is going to care about the the patient signed and about what he walked out with at the time he was seen.

If I speak to your priorities and reputation on this board, I'd get banned so I'll just keep my mouth shut and tell you to focus.
 

Zigner

Senior Member, Non-Attorney
Wrong about what? Advising the OP to file a claim due to the unreasonable outrageous expense of a hand brace in the amount of 138.00? Seriously Antigone it seems evident your priorities are in disarray. ;)
It is absolute asinine to make this suggestion. There is nobody to "file a claim" against and there is no reason for the OP to sue anybody :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential
data-ad-format="auto">
Top