LdiJ
Senior Member
The real problem is that legally the entity could not withhold the records from the child's father, and the child's father had the legal right to give them to whomever he chose. It was a morally repugnant thing for the child's father to do, but nevertheless, legal.That's pretty offensive. does no one have any real advice? I guess it wouldn't matter to know criminal charges were filed before I ever thought of civil issues.... As a single mother of 3 I work my butt off to provide and this senseless, malicious case put my daughter under major distress as well as myself. It angers me an entity has no real responsibility in protecting healthcare records, and they did get fined by my state... So this is not just about money, it's about justice and making sure this can't happen to anyone else. I've already done a lot of talking to various agencies about how in the digital age entities can have alert systems etc when it comes to accessing electronic records. So, just because I didn't tell you guys my entire life in regards to this issue doesn't mean I'm more worried about money, it's actually the last thing I started talks about. Hence, the only real advice I got here, the statute of limitations.... Which could very well be the one thing that keeps me from monetary damages.....only because I haven't filed suit why? Because I was too busy getting my family stable again and holding people accountable.
Any real advice? Statutes? Case info? Anything other than insults....
The illegal thing that happened was the GF accessing the info, and she and the entity have both been/are being punished for that. You could sue for monetary damages if you are within the statute of limitations, but since the records ended up being available to them via a legal source anyway, it would be difficult to prove that the damages were due to the illegal actions of the GF.
By all means speak to an attorney. If you find an attorney who is willing to take the case on contingency, you might have a shot at it. If you cannot find one willing to take the case on contingency, then its probably a no-go.