baesmile1 said:
Thanks again for great information. Few questions... Do I have the right to ask for the manual of procedures? Is this public information, or would the state Medicare have this, or only the state information? I see your note regarding keeping my expectations reasonable. To be completely honest, it is not about the money to me - I know that people say that all the time, but it really is not. I would be donating to MDA. I am curious though if the cost of the lawyer, etc would be worth the type of claim I would make. Does this make sense? I know that noone would be able to say what amount, but expectation wise what range? In the event that the lawyer did not take the case based on a % of payout - I am also facing having to pay the 2000-2500 charge for the medical review. I just cant afford to put too much into this without at least recovering what I put in. I will pursue the complaint regardless, but just cannot determine what I am looking at as far as what I will be charged and if it will be worth it. At the same time, it is hard to place a monetary value on any of it to me.
Your attorney will obtain copies of the nursing home records, the nursing home's policy and procedure manual, and the hospital records. The attorney can save money by requesting the table of contents from the nursing home's policy and procedure manual, identifying the sections needed, and requesting copies of those pages instead of paying for a copy of the entire manual. Be sure to request the RNs employee files, the nursing logs for the day of the incident and at least a week prior to that date and for all of the days after the incident through the last day your brother was at the facility. Ask for all memos, etc. (to and from the DON and administrator, and/or the nursing home's RN educator).
You may be able to get the attorney to pay for the expert review if you print out the entire article that I referenced. I found several articles that support your claim and if you have your private messaging on or will provide an email address, I will be glad to send you the links to the additional articles.
A key point is that one does not start feeding through a PEG tube until one has verified placement. Nursing homes do not have equipment necessary to verify placement of a PEG tube. A reasonable and prudent RN would not initiate feedings or give meds through a PEG tube until placement had been verified by radiology. (Checking for pH of aspirated contents can be used to check placement but nursing homes don't have the necessary testing materials and pH testing can not tell you if the contents came from the peritoneal cavity or the "stomach".)
Another key point is that when a PEG tube is pulled out by the patient, chances are great that at that time, stomach contents spilled into the peritoneal cavity and even correct tube replacement cannot and does not identify or correct perionitis that occurred from the spillage of stomach contents into the peritoneal cavity when the tube was pulled out. Again, x-rays are needed to either confirm spillage into the peritoneal cavity or rule out spillage into the peritoneal cavity.
Even board-certified gastroenterologists who replace a PEG tube at the bedside (or insert a catheter to keep the stoma open) follow-up with an x-ray; it is the standard of care.
As for the amount for which you should sue, that will be determined once the attorney evaluates the aspects of the claim. That will require reviewing all of the records and gaining expert opinion on several aspects. Your claim will require an RN expert's review of the records and subsequent expert opinion. Your claim will require an expert review of the records by a physician who provides the same type services as the nursing home's physician, which will be less costly than the next expert you will need...the enterologist. An enterologist of the same type that inserted the PEG tube for your brother's care will be needed to review the records and opine. $3-5K is a reasonable (low) estimate for the expert reviews.
As for your statement about not wanting "the money": you need to change your attitude. If you are in this for the long-haul, you had better be thinking 'they will pay for what they did to my brother' or you won't make it through the process.
Nursing homes don't have as many defense resources as do major hospitals, so I am kind of anticipating this not being as aggressively defended as if you were up against a hospital.
I forgot to add one other thing. The nurse did check with the doctor - she faxed to him when the tube came out initially. The fax states... "Pulled out G-tube today. Replaced 15fr/5cc foley cath is this ok or should we send over to gastrointerology to replace on he already had? Call ASAP" The doctor's written response on the fax is "OK to try - thanks"
I think this is a great piece of evidence for your side. The nurse KNEW she shouldn't be responsible for PEG tube replacement and verification of the tube's being properly placed or she wouldn't have questioned her actions. The physician's response was idiotic. "OK to try" when the nurse told the MD she had already replaced the tube with a foley. The physician did not even answer the question about sending the patient over to gastroenterology.
I think you have a "slam dunk" claim.
EC