HOME LAW INSURANCE

Search      

Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > ACCIDENT AND INJURY LAW > Medical and Health Care Malpractice
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Medical and Health Care Malpractice Includes Doctor, Dentist, Druggist, Hospital and Nursing Home Malpractice



               


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-2008, 09:04 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1

Plastic Surgery leads to detached retina, with additional complications


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

I had multiple procedures - rhinoplasty, brow lift, a little throat lipo, and at the last minute I took the PS suggestion and added lower bleph. I received great info on all the possible risks except the lower bleph. The doctor did not meet with me again after I added this, never told me about the chance of retinal detachment, did not discuss my risk factors - such as being very near sighted and severe facial swelling due to allergic reactions.

My eyes swelled severely for well over a week - I slept sitting up, used ice packs, finally got the PS to give me a opthamolgic eye gel - finally it occurred to me to try benedryl, and over the course of a couple of days the swelling came down.

After I healed my eyes were always bothering me - my vision would blur and just bother me. I stopped by the optometrist, I had seen right before surgery - office staff told me it was just the slight cataract I had. Two months later, I got the tell tale curtain in my vision and was taken into emergency surgery - laser, gas bubble and sclera buckle. 3 weeks face down 45 minutes of each day.

There is some literature that indicates the retinal detachment could have been caused by the extenisve trauma and swelling.

4 1/2 months and $5,000 later - my eye is still very problematic - my pupil is permanently dilated, my cataract worsened due to the gas bubble treatment, and my vision is not correctable with glasses (due to the sever difference in vision of my other eye).

I would not have had the original PS surgery, if I had known about my risk factors retinal detachment - the doctor, who I had used before, took it for granted that he knew I would heal well as I have done before...and didn't take the time to ask about my risk factors...

Do I have a case to minimally pursue reimbursement for the medical expenses resulting from my retinal detachment? and perhaps more as my vision isn't improving and I am probably going to have serious difficulties for life.

Thanks in advance for your advice.
LWhat is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2008, 07:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the bay
Posts: 1,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeannen View Post
What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? California

I had multiple procedures - rhinoplasty, brow lift, a little throat lipo, and at the last minute I took the PS suggestion and added lower bleph. I received great info on all the possible risks except the lower bleph. The doctor did not meet with me again after I added this, never told me about the chance of retinal detachment, did not discuss my risk factors - such as being very near sighted and severe facial swelling due to allergic reactions.

My eyes swelled severely for well over a week - I slept sitting up, used ice packs, finally got the PS to give me a opthamolgic eye gel - finally it occurred to me to try benedryl, and over the course of a couple of days the swelling came down.

After I healed my eyes were always bothering me - my vision would blur and just bother me. I stopped by the optometrist, I had seen right before surgery - office staff told me it was just the slight cataract I had. Two months later, I got the tell tale curtain in my vision and was taken into emergency surgery - laser, gas bubble and sclera buckle. 3 weeks face down 45 minutes of each day.

There is some literature that indicates the retinal detachment could have been caused by the extenisve trauma and swelling.

4 1/2 months and $5,000 later - my eye is still very problematic - my pupil is permanently dilated, my cataract worsened due to the gas bubble treatment, and my vision is not correctable with glasses (due to the sever difference in vision of my other eye).

I would not have had the original PS surgery, if I had known about my risk factors retinal detachment - the doctor, who I had used before, took it for granted that he knew I would heal well as I have done before...and didn't take the time to ask about my risk factors...

Do I have a case to minimally pursue reimbursement for the medical expenses resulting from my retinal detachment? and perhaps more as my vision isn't improving and I am probably going to have serious difficulties for life.

Thanks in advance for your advice.
LWhat is the name of your state (only U.S. law)?
I highly doubt the possibility of allergic reaction was not convered in your informed consent.

Did your Surgeon know about, or advise the use of Benadryl? An antihistimine may have been contra-indicated for your post op condition, or with the other medication he prescribed.
__________________
"I don't know if they taught you this in the land of fairies and puppy-dog tails, where you obviously, if not grew up then at least spent most of your summers, but you're in the real world now. Nnnnn-kay?"...Dr. Perry Cox
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2008, 08:33 PM
lya lya is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: flying city
Posts: 830
I'm not finding any sources that relate a detached retina to lower bleph surgery.

Trauma that may lead to retinal detachment or retinal tear is such as would happen if the eye received a direct blow from a fist or a tennis ball or sufferred a penetrating eye injury. Trauma from lower eyelid surgery is not equal to the trauma required to detach or tear the retina.

The patient has a longterm history of near-sightedness, which carries a high risks of leading to retinal detachment.

I seriously doubt one would be able to prove that the swelling from the lower bleph caused the retinal tear/detachment rather than did the near-sightedness.

Benadryl increases intraoccular pressure. It is quite possible the patient caused the retinal detachment by taking Benadryl and increasing intraoccular pressure.

Many opthalmic gels and drops are contraindicated or advised to be used with caution in patients with increased intraoccular pressure as it may lead to retinal tear or detachment. Perhaps the eye gel contributed to the problem. Again, the patient prescribed this treatment; and, used it in conjunction with Benadryl.

I believe it would be most difficult, if not impossible, to attribute the damage to any act of negligence/medical malpractice.
__________________
lya
------------------------------------------------------------------------
May we all have a blessed new year, 2009.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Find a Lawyer
Step 1:
Step 2:
 
Find a Lawyer
Post Your Case
Post your case and have it reviewed by a highly respected attorney. NO Cost, NO obligation, NO Fees! Get started now »
Get Legal Forms
Download 36,000+ forms »


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.

Contact Us - FreeAdvice - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top                                        


IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.