Recent content by alaska81

Just seems like the boat is always set up for the one who isn’t paying and acres the one who is owed money. Ohio should understand that retroactive modification isn’t really a thing.

Doing the math at $903 a month $65,000 in arrears adds up to 72 months of non payment. In order for that $1200 they are holding to be exceeded they’d have to drop the amount due for each of those 72 months to less than $17. Seems pretty unlikely. In the meantime if this takes months they...

I should add that none of the arrearages are interest either, it’s all just past due support. None of the states involved have added interest.

There is literally no way to bring a balance of $65,000 down to $1200 unless they allowed him a 0 due for several years during that time period. And there would be no reason to bring him to a 0 due for any of those months. My understanding is that the court doesn’t allow a retroactive...

It does say no specific amount per child. It’s been a frustrating situation for me for years because I’ve done my part and even pushed to have the order modified at times and NC told me that without his cooperation there was nothing they could do. Each time one of the kids aged out the NC...

Also even if they did just what I said and counted the years since the kids aged out and subtracted $225 per kid per month it still leaves a balance of around $40,000. So there still would be no reason to hold payments now. He literally went years without making a single payment and there vast...

It is difficult though because the order does not specify a specific amount per child, just that he pays $903 per month. It stated that modifications could happen due to a change in circumstances. A child aging out is a change in circumstances and he failed to do his part to modify the order...

Truthfully if I run the calculator based on three kids or even 2 kids with the current income and allowing me a credit for the insurance instead of him, and figuring in his 0 days of parenting time and my additional child, he’d actually owe more than the 900 a month up until the time the second...

Additionally, each time a child aged out the office where I was located sent him a packet asking him for his information so they could modify the order based on a child aging out and he ignored these and never responded.

I’d be fine with that and was trying to do so but at this point it would be really difficult. Oldest is 23. Then a 22 and a 19. How would they decide how much he owed for those years? Would they just recalculate based on three kids and then two and then 1 based on current income? Would they ask...

So this involves multiple states. Order was done by divorce decree in TN. After the divorce non custodial moved to California, I moved to NC and filed the order in NC for enforcement. Non custodial then didn’t pay for years. There is a significant arrearage of around $65k. There were 4 kids on...

Yes after speaking with my insurance company, my insurance company feels that the other driver is more at fault, but that I also carry some fault and I can agree with that. However the problem is the other party told their insurance company that they were on the shoulder. This is blatantly false...

I sincerely hope you are never involved in an accident immediately after a curve in the road. It had nothing to do with the condition of the road and everything to do with the fact that I’d just come around a curve and found a full size truck in my lane. So should everyone going around that...

No no, they had not hit the moose. Another driver had hit the moose. They were part of the roadkill lottery to get the moose after it was hit. Part of the instructions for that program say that they are to wait for a wildlife trooper to arrive and release possession of the animal. This is part...

I have reported it to my insurer. Alaska is a comparative fault state and I fully understand that I carry some fault however I think they also shoulder a large portion of fault. They were illegally parked on a roadway in a safety corridor. Facing into oncoming traffic in he wrong lane in a no...