Home     Law Advice     Insurance Advice     Community    
Go Back   FreeAdvice Legal Forum > GOVERNMENT & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW > Military Law

Powered by Attorney Pages


  Find An Attorney In Your Area    
 

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2009, 08:48 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Exclamation

Need Help


What is the name of your state (only U.S. law)? WI

I don't know if I'm in the right place here. I've been trying to enlist in the WI ARNG (Army National Guard) for 6 months, and have run into an issue of which I need help. I was charged with a felony over 4 years ago, and had it plead down to 2 misdemeanors (battery and disorderly conduct). I read through the statutes and subparagraphs in conjunction to my charge and convictions to see if there was anything in fine print stating anything about the charge or conviction(s) being domestic--they weren't. Part of the military is saying that there is no reason why I'm unable to enlist, yet, another part is saying that I classify under what they call lautenburg. JAG has instructed my recruiting SGTs to have me talk to the DA and see if he may be able to reduce everything from state statutes down to city ordinances. How would I go about doing this without reopening the case, seeing how the agreement was made over 4 years ago, I don't fall into the age bracket to have it exponged (20 years old or younger; I was charged when I was 21, and am 26 now), I've completed all of the programs required by the courts in this case, and I know that reopening the case could be more detramental than good. How would I go about doing this so that I may be able to complete the enlistment process?
  #2  
Old 01-20-2009, 10:42 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Back from Iraq
Posts: 604
Lautenberg = Domestic.


Try again, tell us what actually happened. Who did you strike?
__________________
Just some schmuck with a truck... And a high I.Q.

"A young man who does not have what it takes to perform military service is not likely to have what it takes to make a living." - John F. Kennedy

I do not help deserters...

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsabellaSoriano View Post
that's like saying robbing a doughnut shop is entrapment.
  #3  
Old 01-22-2009, 01:08 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 652
The statute and/or the crime charged do not necessarily tell the whole story. Even if you are not charged with a "domestic violence" crime, if the facts underpinning the charge show such violence, you will probably be found ineligible for a firearm under Lautenberg. For example, suppose you are charged with 'simple' assault. It is a misdemeanor and the statute say nothing about domestic violence. BUT, if the police report, etc. says that you struck a girlfriend or spouse or whatever -- then you will probably be found ineligible.

Frequently people will "plead down" to try and avoid having a specific finding of "domestic violence" or of being convicted of a crime with domestic violence in the title. For example, they plead to simple battery instead of "battery of a household member". This way, it doesn't pop out obvious in a lot of cases. But if someone investigates and finds out that it was indeed a household member you battered -- then you are still ineligible even though you were never convicted of it and it wasn't an element of the crime.

So, what were the facts (or alleged facts) of your conviction? Never mind what you were convicted of in court, what supposedly happened to get the cops involved in the first place?
If it qualifies as "domestic violence" then you are ineligible for a firearm. So if you have any, better check with a lawyer real quick and find out if you should get rid of it.
  #4  
Old 01-31-2009, 08:32 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10

My Story


I was charged with reckless bodily harm to a child (my son), of which I was framed for (which I found out after accepting the plea)... it was amended down to battery to SS (my son) and disorderly conduct... I received 2 years probation, along with parenting classes (which were complete prior to any agreement made), and being compliance w/ CPS and the CHIPS case requirements, which I've since completed all of the afformentioned... it's been nearly 4 years since the offense... I read the WI statutes on the charge and convictions... there's nothing in those stats that state what I did was domestic... MEPS is the one that's fighting it...
  #5  
Old 01-31-2009, 08:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10

Talking W/ The DA


I have spoken w/ one of the DA's in my community (although he wasn't the one directly involved in my case)... I've been given an opportunity to talk w/ the head of the DA's office, but he's yet to return my call (which was made on Thursday)... if I don't hear back from him by Tuesday, I'm going to call again... my former defense attorney hasn't returned any of my calls requesting consultation on how to go about the process... people are gradually coming out of the wood work, but until then, I'm fighting an uphill battle...
  #6  
Old 01-31-2009, 08:55 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 652
There you have it - battery to your son. Under the Lautenberg Amendment that makes it a crime of domestic violence. Disqualified from gun ownership by federal law. It doesn't matter what the WI statutes, etc. say. The federal statute defines a "crime of domestic violence" and it would appear that your crime fits it. Doesn't matter how long ago, doesn't matter if you served your sentence (took classes, etc.). You'll probably need expungement or a pardon unless there is some reason your conviction wasn't qualifying (apparently you had a lawyer).
  #7  
Old 02-02-2009, 10:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
the thing is MEPS is the only thing fighting it... no one else is... why is it that they no longer base enlistment off of the actual conviction in opposition to the charge now?? this doesn't make sense to me... I do know that JAG wants me to get it reduced down to a city ord., but would MEPS still try and fight it as a city ord.?? would I need to talk w/ my recruiter about possibly sending in a moral waiver??

Last edited by armyof3; 02-02-2009 at 10:50 AM.
  #8  
Old 02-02-2009, 11:26 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Back from Iraq
Posts: 604
Uhh... When you made the plea agreement, you were CONVICTED of BATTERY on your SON. What part of this is hard to understand? That's disqualifying you for an ACTUAL CONVICTION, nothing to do with the original charge.
__________________
Just some schmuck with a truck... And a high I.Q.

"A young man who does not have what it takes to perform military service is not likely to have what it takes to make a living." - John F. Kennedy

I do not help deserters...

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsabellaSoriano View Post
that's like saying robbing a doughnut shop is entrapment.
  #9  
Old 02-02-2009, 11:44 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
DRTDEVL, it's not that I don't understand what I was convicted of and how that factors into what's going on, but please reread my previous post... there's more to it than just that...
  #10  
Old 02-03-2009, 10:11 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Back from Iraq
Posts: 604
Unless you somehow miraculously come up with a way to become eligible to possess firearms again, it ain't gonna happen.

Google "Lautenberg"
__________________
Just some schmuck with a truck... And a high I.Q.

"A young man who does not have what it takes to perform military service is not likely to have what it takes to make a living." - John F. Kennedy

I do not help deserters...

Quote:
Originally Posted by IsabellaSoriano View Post
that's like saying robbing a doughnut shop is entrapment.
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:20 AM.



IMPORTANT NOTICE
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED ON THIS PAGE WERE NOT REVIEWED BY THE EDITORIAL STAFF OR ATTORNEYS AT FREEADVICE.COM. Thousands of professionally prepared and reviewed questions and answers in 130 legal categories are to be found at the Question and Answer pages at FreeAdvice.com.

F
reeAdvice Forums are intended to enable consumers to benefit from the experience of other consumers who have faced similar legal issues. FreeAdvice does NOT vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any posting or the qualifications of any person responding. Use of the Forums is subject to our Terms and Conditions which prohibit advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, or false, defamatory, abusive, vulgar, or harassing messages, and subject violators to a fee for each improper posting. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of FreeAdvice. Information on FreeAdvice or a Forum should not be relied upon and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction who you have retained to represent you. To locate an attorney visit AttorneyPages.com. Copyright since 1995 by Advice Company. All Rights Reserved.